Search Results for "mandatory examination"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "mandatory examination"

2979 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2979 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Accused to Produce Documents in NI Act Case — Section 294 CrPC Does Not Bar Filing of Documents at Any Stage. The court held that the Magistrate erred in rejecting the application for production of documents as there is no limitation of time for filing documents under Section 294 CrPC.

18 Apr 2026

The petitioners, who are accused in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, filed an application under Section 294 of t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Accused to Produce Documents in NI Act Case — Section 294 CrPC Does Not Bar Filing of Documents at Later Stage. Accused entitled to produce sale deed, correction deed, and development permissions to substantiate defence in cheque dishonour case.

18 Apr 2026

The petitioners, M/s Ascent Ventures and its partners, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the order dated 14.11.2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Accused to Produce Documents in NI Act Case — Section 294 CrPC Does Not Bar Filing of Documents at Any Stage. The court held that documents relevant for defence must be allowed to be produced and admitted or denied under Section 294 CrPC, setting aside the trial court's rejection order.

18 Apr 2026

The petitioners, M/s Ascent Ventures and its partners, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Accused to Produce Documents in NI Act Case — Section 294 CrPC Does Not Bar Production of Documents at Any Stage. The court held that the Magistrate erred in rejecting the application for production of documents as Section 294 CrPC permits production at any stage if relevant for just decision.

16 Apr 2026

The petitioners, accused in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, filed an application under Section 294 of the Code ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeals in Transfer Pricing and Reassessment Cases — Upholds ITAT Orders on Arm's Length Price and Non-Disclosure of Material Facts.

7 Jul 2026

The judgment pertains to two Income Tax Appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. ITA No. 55/2024 arises from an o...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Considers Application Under Section 482 CrPC Seeking Quashing of Complaint Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Applicant Challenges Vicarious Liability Under Section 141 and Compliance with Section 202 CrPC Inquiry in Cheque Dishonour Case.

13 Oct 2017

The applicant preferred a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the proceedings in a complaint u...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, in a PIL filed by a trade union of airport employees, pronounced an order on 14-09-2021, examining the legality of the privatisation of Mangaluru International Airport under the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994. The court considered allegations that the concession agreement with Adani Enterprises Limited violated Sections 12, 12A, and 21 of the Act, and that the bidding process lacked transparency.

14 Sep 2021

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by the Airports Authority Employees Union, a registered trade ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Injunction Suit – No Substantial Question of Law Under Section 100 CPC. Defendants’ Construction Restrained and Ordered Demolished as Plaintiff’s Possession and Title Acknowledged; Mundkar Rights Did Not Extend to New Structure; Injunction Without Declaration Maintainable.

24 Jul 2026

The dispute concerned property surveyed No. 101/21 in Village Parra, Bardez, Goa, along with House No. 172/3. The original plaintiff, Mathew Francis R...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Tenant in Eviction Proceedings Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 — Delay Condonation Application Rejected on Constructive Res Judicata Basis Set Aside as Earlier Dismissals Were Not on Merits. The Court held that dismissal of earlier applications for setting aside ex parte decree due to non-compliance with mandatory deposit under Section 17 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, 1887 did not operate as constructive res judicata, as there was no adjudication on merits.

18 Jun 2015

The writ petition arose from eviction proceedings under the Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999, wherein the respondent-landlord had obtained an ex par...

High Court

Bombay High Court Reconsiders Promoter's Right to Additional Construction Under MOFA After Supreme Court Remand. Dispute Centers on Whether Section 7A Overrides Flat Purchasers' Consent Requirement for Additional Wings in an Existing Scheme.

7 Oct 2010

The Bombay High Court heard two first appeals remanded by the Supreme Court in a dispute between Madhuvihar Cooperative Housing Society (the society) ...

42 43 44 45 46

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)