Bombay High Court Allows Accused to Produce Documents in NI Act Case — Section 294 CrPC Does Not Bar Filing of Documents at Any Stage. The court held that the Magistrate erred in rejecting the application for production of documents as there is no limitation of time for filing documents under Section 294 CrPC.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 8
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, who are accused in a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, filed an application under Section 294 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking permission to produce certain documents and for a direction to the complainant to admit or deny those documents. The documents included a sale deed dated 25.07.2012, a correction deed dated 05.09.2014, revised development permissions, a TILR map, and a newspaper publication. The petitioners contended that these documents were relevant for their defence and that the sale deed had been deliberately suppressed by the complainant. The Magistrate rejected the application on the ground that the documents were not filed earlier. The High Court held that Section 294 CrPC does not impose any restriction on the accused to file documents at any stage of the trial; it only provides a procedure for admission or denial of documents. The court observed that the documents sought to be produced were relevant for the defence and that the accused should be permitted to place them on record to ensure a fair trial. The High Court quashed the impugned order and directed the Magistrate to allow the application and give a direction to the complainant to admit or deny the documents within a specified time.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Section 294 CrPC - Admission or Denial of Documents - The provision under Section 294 CrPC only contemplates the procedure for admission or denial of documents and does not impose any restriction on the accused to file documents at any stage of the trial. The Magistrate erred in rejecting the application on the ground that the documents were not filed earlier. (Paras 6-8)

B) Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - Section 138 - Dishonour of Cheque - Defence Documents - The accused in a complaint under Section 138 of the NI Act is entitled to produce documents that are relevant for his defence, including sale deed, correction deed, and development permissions, even if not filed earlier. The court must allow such documents to be placed on record to ensure fair trial. (Paras 2-4, 8)

C) Criminal Procedure Code - Section 294 CrPC - Stage of Filing Documents - There is no limitation of time for filing documents under Section 294 CrPC. The accused can file documents at any stage before the conclusion of trial, and the court is bound to give direction to the complainant to admit or deny the same. (Para 8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Magistrate was justified in rejecting the application filed by the accused under Section 294 CrPC seeking permission to produce documents and for direction to the complainant to admit or deny the same.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the petition, quashed the order dated 14.11.2025, and directed the Magistrate to allow the application under Section 294 CrPC and give direction to the complainant to admit or deny the documents within a specified time.

Law Points

  • Section 294 CrPC permits admission or denial of documents
  • does not restrict filing of documents by accused
  • documents can be produced at any stage if relevant for defence
  • no limitation period for filing documents under Section 294 CrPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026:BHC-AUG:16847

Criminal Writ Petition No. 81 of 2026

2026-04-18

Mehroz K. Pathan

2026:BHC-AUG:16847

Mr. S. S. Patil for Petitioners, Ms. P. J. Bharad APP for Respondent No. 1, Mr. P. F. Patni for Respondent No. 2

M/s Ascent Ventures, Sameer Ramanlal Bhandari, Darshana Sameer Bhandari, Ramanlal Chunnilal Bhandari

The State of Maharashtra, Dr. Sachin Gopalrao Saoji

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order of the Magistrate rejecting application under Section 294 CrPC for production of documents.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of order dated 14.11.2025 passed by the 11th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, and allowing the application (Exh. 36) for permission to produce documents and direction to complainant to admit or deny them.

Filing Reason

The petitioners (accused) sought to produce certain documents relevant to their defence in a complaint under Section 138 of the NI Act, which the Magistrate rejected on the ground that they were not filed earlier.

Previous Decisions

The Magistrate rejected the application under Section 294 CrPC vide order dated 14.11.2025 in S.C.C. No. 5745 of 2019.

Issues

Whether the Magistrate was justified in rejecting the application under Section 294 CrPC on the ground that the documents were not filed earlier? Whether there is any limitation of time for filing documents under Section 294 CrPC?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners: The documents are relevant for defence; Section 294 CrPC does not bar filing at any stage; similar applications were filed in all four complaints under Section 138 NI Act. Respondent: Section 294 CrPC only contemplates admission or denial; the application is not tenable as documents were not filed earlier.

Ratio Decidendi

Section 294 CrPC does not impose any restriction on the accused to file documents at any stage of the trial; it only provides a procedure for admission or denial of documents. The accused is entitled to produce documents relevant for defence to ensure a fair trial.

Judgment Excerpts

Section 294 Cr.P.C. only contemplates admission or denial of documents and does not impose any restriction on the accused to file documents at any stage of the trial. The documents sought to be produced are relevant for the defence of the petitioners and would assist them in substantiating their defence.

Procedural History

The petitioners (accused) filed an application under Section 294 CrPC in S.C.C. No. 5745 of 2019 pending before the 11th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad, seeking permission to produce documents and direction to complainant to admit or deny them. The Magistrate rejected the application on 14.11.2025. The petitioners then filed the present Criminal Writ Petition before the High Court challenging that order.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 294
  • Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: 138
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Accused to Produce Documents in NI Act Case — Section 294 CrPC Does Not Bar Filing of Documents at Any Stage. The court held that the Magistrate erred in rejecting the application for production of documents as there is no ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds DDA's Right to Demand Unearned Increase in Jaiprakash Industries Case. Landmark Ruling Clarifies Legal Implications of Amalgamations on Lease Agreements.