Bombay High Court hears Writ Petition concerning land acquisition for Panvel-Virar-Alibaug Multipurpose Corridor project. The petition challenges acquisition proceedings and seeks adequate compensation and rehabilitation.
8 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "indefinite period"
440 result(s) found
Found 440 result(s)
High Court
Madras High Court Directs Authorities to Consider Representation on Encroachment Allegations in Public Land Dispute. Court Holds Non-Consideration of Representation by Statutory Authority Amounts to Dereliction of Duty Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.
9 Jan 2025The petitioner, Vinoth Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court s...
- 94
High Court
Madras High Court Directs Authorities to Consider Representation on Encroachment Removal in Writ of Mandamus — Non-Consideration of Representation Amounts to Dereliction of Duty. The Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's representation dated 04.11.2024 regarding removal of encroachment in S.No.475/17, Maravamangalam Village, Kalayarkoil Taluk, Sivagangai District within three months.
6 Jan 2025The petitioner, R. Kamalam, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a Writ of Mandamus to direct respondents 1 to...
- 43
High Court
Madras High Court Directs Government to Consider Representation for Notification of Village for 'Vada Manju Virattu' Event. The court held that non-consideration of a representation by a statutory authority amounts to dereliction of duty, warranting a direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
6 Jan 2025The petitioner, Alex, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court seeking a...
- 105
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Reserves Judgment on Challenge to Fringe Benefit Tax Provisions. Petitions question constitutional validity of Chapter XII-H of Income Tax Act, 1961 as violative of Article 14 and beyond legislative competence.
6 Dec 2019The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard three writ petitions filed by M/s T.T.K. Prestige Ltd. and another, M/s N. Rangarao & Sons, and Karnata...
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Challenge to Automatic Vacation of Stay Under KVAT Act — Limitation of 365 Days for Disposal of Appeal Held Reasonable. Section 63(7)(b) of Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, which provides for automatic vacation of stay if appeal not disposed within 365 days, is not arbitrary or violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.
28 Jun 2017The petitioner, M/s. Shakthi Specialities, an assessee under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, filed writ petitions challenging the constitutio...
- 46
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Sales Tax Case — Re-assessment Not Permissible Under Rectification of Mistake. The Court held that rectification under Section 69 of the KVAT Act cannot be used to re-assess escaped turnover without following the procedure under Section 39.
24 Aug 2016The petitioner, M/s. Hema Engineering, a dealer registered under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, filed revision petitions under Section 65(1)...
- 48
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Entry Tax Case — Exemption Notification for Industrial Units Must Be Interpreted Broadly. The court held that the term 'component parts of goods manufactured' in the exemption notification includes raw materials and component parts used in the manufacture of finished products, and the assessee is entitled to exemption on the entry of such goods.
19 Nov 2015The petitioner, M/s. JK Tyre & Industries Ltd. (formerly M/s. Vikrant Tyres Ltd.), is engaged in the manufacture and sale of automotive tyres, tubes, ...
- 17
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case Due to Non-Application of Mind by ITAT — Reassessment Based on Revised Return Under Immunity Scheme Held Invalid Without Proper Examination of Section 143(1) Acceptance. The court held that the Assessing Officer must have independent reasons to believe income escaped assessment, and the revised return under the Immunity Scheme could not be the sole basis for reopening under Section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
20 Apr 2015The case pertains to an appeal filed by the assessee, Sri K Nagesh, against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), Bangalore, dated 29...
- 51
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Theft Conviction of Air Force Cadet for Unauthorised Flight of Aircraft. Temporary Unauthorised Use of Government Aircraft for Personal Purposes Amounts to Dishonest Misappropriation Under Section 378 of Indian Penal Code, 1860.
11 Feb 1957The case concerned the prosecution of K. N. Mehra, a cadet at the Indian Air Force Academy, Jodhpur, for theft of an aircraft under Section 378 of the...
- 21
