Search Results for "Trial Fairness"

978 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 978 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Prosecution Failed to Prove Offences Under Sections 366A and 376 IPC Beyond Reasonable Doubt as Victim's Testimony Was Unreliable and Medical Evidence Did Not Support Allegations.

The appellant, Kadamban, was convicted by the Principal District & Sessions Judge, Tumkur, in S.C. No. 274/2012 for offences under Sections 366A (kidn...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Denial of Fair Trial and Legal Aid. Conviction under Section 376 IPC set aside as trial court failed to provide legal representation after counsel withdrew, violating Article 21.

The appellant, Suhhalal s/o Zitu Lilare, was convicted by the 3rd Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur in Sessions Case 34/2002 for an offence...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubt Over Cause of Death. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Medical Evidence Did Not Establish Hammer Blow as Cause of Death, and Eye Witness Testimony Was Contradictory.

The appellant, Satish Suresh Shrisundar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, in Sessions Case No.200/2014 on 29.12.2016 for of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Benefit of Doubt on Juvenile Status and Inconsistent Evidence. Claim of juvenility at time of offence not properly considered; conviction under Sections 302, 307 read with 34 IPC set aside.

The appellant, Channappa, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Yadgir, in S.C. No. 40/2012 for offences punishable under Sections 307, 302 read with 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Full Bench Holds Trial Court Can Frame Preliminary Issue Under Section 9-A CPC Disposing of Suit in Part. The Court interprets Section 9-A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (Maharashtra Amendment) to allow partial disposal of suit or cause of action on preliminary issue of jurisdiction.

The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was constituted to answer a reference on whether a trial court, under Section 9-A of the Code of Civil Procedu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Assault on Public Servant Case Due to Material Contradictions in Witness Testimony. Conviction under Section 332 IPC set aside as prosecution witnesses gave conflicting accounts of who landed the fist blow, rendering them unreliable.

The case arises from a criminal revision application challenging the conviction of Azharali Jaferali Qureshi (the applicant) under Section 332 read wi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal for Cancellation of Bail in Murder Conviction Case Due to Subsequent Offence and Judicial Pressure. Bail revocation sought under Section 389(1) CrPC based on new FIR alleging murder and prior convictions, with court noting judicial officer's pressure from police and accused.

The appeal arose from an order of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh dated 23 July 2019, which declined to entertain applications for cancellation of ba...