Search Results for "Section 2(13)"

858 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 858 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Suit for Declaration of Title and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Ownership and Possession Over Suit Property.

The case involves two regular second appeals filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against the judgment and decree dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Gang Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(g) IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support the prosecution case.

The appellants, Mangesh Vitthal Waghmare and Devidas Balchandra Rathod, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Washim, in Atrocity Case No. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Guardianship and Maintenance Proceedings from Nashik to Pune on Grounds of Wife's Convenience and Safety. Wife's difficulty in traveling with minor child and safety concerns outweigh husband's inconvenience in traveling from Kolkata.

The applicant, Sunanda Dasgupta, wife of the respondent Tapashankar Dasgupta, filed an application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Petitions Challenging Tender and Work Orders in Cooperative Milk Marketing. Petitions Filed by Warehousing Agent and Co-Packer Against Karnataka Cooperative Milk Federation and Its Unions Alleging Breach of Exclusive Contracts for Telangana Operations.

Background: The case involved two writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka challenging certain actions of the Karnataka Co-operative Mi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award Based on Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrator. Unilateral Appointment Does Not Violate Section 12(5) Read with Seventh Schedule When Arbitrator Not Disqualified and Objection Waived by Participation.

The petitioners, Hanuman Motors Pvt. Ltd. and another, challenged an arbitral award passed by a sole arbitrator appointed by the respondent, M/s. Tata...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Petitioners in DCR Interpretation Case Following Supreme Court's Godrej & Boyce Ruling. The Court Holds That Paragraph 6 of Appendix VII Entitles Owner to DRC Equal to Area of Constructed Amenity, Rejecting Circulars Limiting to 25%.

Background: The consolidated writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay under Article 226 of the Constitution concerning ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Against Single Judge Order Dismissing Section 34 Petition Due to Foreign Seat and Governing Law — Interpretation of Escrow Agreement Clauses

The appeal arose from a Commercial Appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Katra Holdings Ltd., a Mauritius co...