Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Guardianship and Maintenance Proceedings from Nashik to Pune on Grounds of Wife's Convenience and Safety. Wife's difficulty in traveling with minor child and safety concerns outweigh husband's inconvenience in traveling from Kolkata.

High Court: Bombay High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 65
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The applicant, Sunanda Dasgupta, wife of the respondent Tapashankar Dasgupta, filed an application under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking transfer of two pending proceedings from Nashik to the Family Court at Pune. The first proceeding was Civil Misc. Application No. 213 of 2003 filed by the husband under Sections 7 and 25 of the Guardian and Wards Act, 1890 for declaration of guardianship and custody of the minor child, pending before the 4th Additional District Judge, Nashik. The second proceeding was an application filed by the wife under Section 125 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for maintenance, pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate at Nashik. The wife contended that she was residing in Pune with the minor child and it was extremely difficult for her to travel to Nashik for each hearing, especially with the child. She also expressed safety concerns. The husband opposed the transfer, arguing that he was based in Kolkata and would have to travel to Pune, which was inconvenient. The court, after hearing both sides, held that the balance of convenience was in favour of the wife. The court noted that the wife had to travel with a minor child and that the husband, being an earning member, could conveniently travel to Pune. The court also observed that the Family Court at Pune had jurisdiction to entertain both matters. Accordingly, the court allowed the application and directed the transfer of both proceedings to the Family Court at Pune. The court further directed the Family Court to expedite the hearing and dispose of the matters as early as possible.

Headnote

A) Family Law - Transfer of Proceedings - Section 24 CPC - Transfer of guardianship and maintenance proceedings - Wife sought transfer from Nashik to Pune citing difficulty in traveling with minor child and safety concerns - Court held that balance of convenience lies in favour of the wife, especially when she has to travel with a minor child and the husband can conveniently travel to Pune - Transfer allowed (Paras 1-5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the guardianship and maintenance proceedings pending at Nashik should be transferred to the Family Court at Pune for the convenience of the wife-applicant.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Application allowed. Civil Misc. Application No. 213 of 2003 pending before the 4th Additional District Judge, Nashik, and the maintenance application under Section 125 CrPC pending before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nashik, are transferred to the Family Court at Pune. The Family Court is directed to expedite the hearing and dispose of the matters as early as possible.

Law Points

  • Transfer of proceedings under Section 24 CPC
  • convenience of wife
  • balance of convenience
  • jurisdiction of Family Court
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2005 LawText (BOM) (03) 118

Misc. Civil Application No. 80 of 2004

2005-03-04

Abhay S. Oka, J.

Shri Anil K. Lulla for the Applicant, Ms. Madhavi Deshpande and Shri Manish Upadhya for the Respondent

Sunanda Dasgupta

Tapashankar Dasgupta

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Application for transfer of proceedings under Section 24 CPC

Remedy Sought

Transfer of guardianship and custody proceedings (Civil Misc. Application No. 213 of 2003) and maintenance proceedings (under Section 125 CrPC) from Nashik to Family Court at Pune

Filing Reason

Wife residing in Pune with minor child found it difficult to travel to Nashik for hearings; safety concerns

Issues

Whether the proceedings pending at Nashik should be transferred to Pune for the convenience of the wife-applicant.

Submissions/Arguments

Applicant (wife) argued that she resides in Pune with minor child, traveling to Nashik is difficult and unsafe. Respondent (husband) argued that he resides in Kolkata and would have to travel to Pune, causing inconvenience.

Ratio Decidendi

In transfer applications under Section 24 CPC, the convenience of the wife, especially when she has to travel with a minor child, outweighs the inconvenience to the husband, who is an earning member and can travel. The balance of convenience lies in favour of the wife.

Judgment Excerpts

The Applicant is the wife and the Respondent is the husband. The prayer in this Application is for transfer of the proceedings which are pending in the Courts at Nashik to the Family Court at Pune. Considering the facts of the case, the balance of convenience is in favour of the Applicant-wife. The Family Court at Pune will have jurisdiction to entertain both the proceedings. The Family Court is directed to expedite the hearing and dispose of the matters as early as possible.

Procedural History

The husband filed Civil Misc. Application No. 213 of 2003 under Guardian and Wards Act in the Court of District Judge, Nashik, and the wife filed a maintenance application under Section 125 CrPC before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nashik. The wife then filed Misc. Civil Application No. 80 of 2004 in the Bombay High Court seeking transfer of both proceedings to Pune.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 24
  • Guardian and Wards Act, 1890: Sections 7, 25
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: Section 125
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Guardianship and Maintenance Proceedings from Nashik to Pune on Grounds of Wife's Convenience and Safety. Wife's difficulty in traveling with minor child and safety concerns outweigh husband's inconvenience in tra...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Management's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Teacher with 50% Back Wages. Termination Without Prior Approval Under Section 5 of MEPS Act, 1977 Held Illegal, Reinstatement Upheld.