High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Land Acquisition Compensation Appeals. Claimants challenge the award of the Special Land Acquisition Officer for lands acquired for Karanjwan Dam under the Upper Godavari Project.
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966"
679 result(s) found
Found 679 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Heritage Committee's Approval for Demolition of Heritage Building. Court holds that the Heritage Committee's decision is final and binding, and the petitioners failed to demonstrate any illegality or arbitrariness in the approval process.
5 May 2017The petitioners, Prakash V. Patel and Dilnar Jehanbux Chichgar, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court challenging the ...
- 88
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Construction of 38-Story Building in Cuffe Parade, Mumbai, Holding No Violation of CRZ Norms or FSI Regulations. The court found that the building was not located on a CRZ-I area and that the FSI granted was within permissible limits under DCR 58.
14 Mar 2014The petitioners, comprising residents' associations and trusts, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the construction of a 38-story building...
- 140
High Court
High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Case Upholding Acquisition and Leasing for Public Purpose. Acquisition Completed Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Possession Taken in 2000, and 2013 Act Not Applicable Retrospectively, While Government Resolutions on Plot Allotment Do Not Apply After Ownership Extinguished.
9 Mar 2026The dispute involved petitioners challenging the acquisition of 25.39 acres of their land in Survey No.210, Village Wakad, Pune, for a new town develo...
- 291
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Declaring Lapsing of Land Reservation Under MRTP Act Due to Non-Acquisition. Purchase notice under Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 triggers automatic lapsing of reservation after 10 years from development plan commencement.
13 Aug 2015The petitioners, owners of survey No. 661/A and 661/B within Ichalkaranji Municipal Council, challenged the continued reservation of their lands under...
- 149
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Complaints Against Bharti Airtel for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC — Public Servant Protection Extended to Employees of Municipal Corporation Acting in Discharge of Official Duty. Employees of Municipal Corporation are public servants under Section 21 IPC, and acts of removing unauthorized telephone cables are in discharge of official duty, requiring sanction under Section 197 CrPC before prosecution.
22 Sep 2015The applicant, Bharti Airtel Limited, filed three criminal applications under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of...
- 118
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Demolition of Residential Structures Without Notice in NMM Kamgar Cooperative Housing Society. Court holds that demolition of structures without prior notice under Section 53 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 is illegal and violative of natural justice.
7 Jul 2023The petitioners, residents of NMM Kamgar Cooperative Housing Society in Thane, filed a writ petition challenging the demolition of their residential s...
- 63
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Lapsing of Land Reservation and Directs Compensation for Acquired Land under Right to Fair Compensation Act, 2013. Reservation of land for primary school and play ground lapsed under Section 127 of MRTP Act, 1966; compensation for land used for D.P. Road directed under Act of 2013.
16 Sep 2022The petitioner, Shri Rafiq Ahmed Saeed Qureshi, through his power of attorney, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India be...
- 40
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of Clause 10(a) of Appendix III under DCR 33(7) for Redevelopment of Cessed Properties. The Court held that the requirement of 70% consent of occupants is a reasonable restriction and not violative of fundamental rights under Articles 14, 19(1)(g) and 300A of the Constitution.
20 Mar 2013The petitioners, M/s. J. Gala Enterprises and its partner, purchased a property in 1992 comprising cessed and non-cessed structures with about 220 fam...
- 126
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Declaration of Lapsed Reservation Under MRTP Act for Land Reserved for Municipal Purpose - Purchase Notice Not Responded Within Statutory Period. The court held that failure to acquire land within 12 months of purchase notice under Section 49(7) of MRTP Act results in lapsing of reservation, directing State to issue declaration under Section 127(2).
13 Sep 2022The petitioner, M/s. Sanghvi Erectors Private Limited, owned land admeasuring 3032 sq.mtrs. in Pune, which was reserved for 'municipal purpose' under ...
- 26
