Search Results for "hill division"

538 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 538 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Building Construction Permissions as Barred by Res Judicata and Laches. The Court held that the petitioners had previously litigated the same issues and obtained no relief, and the PIL was filed after substantial construction had already been completed.

The Altamount Road Area Citizens Committee and another petitioner filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes FIR Against Accused in Unlawful Assembly Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations and Communal Harmony. Sections 143, 147, 148, 153A, 504, 506, 149 IPC Not Attracted as Incident Was a Spontaneous Altercation Without Common Object or Communal Motive.

The petitioners, five individuals, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quashing of FIR ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Injunction Against Defendant in Trademark Infringement Case — 'Cothagiri' Mark Deceptively Similar to 'Cothas'. Court Restrains Defendant from Using Mark 'Cothagiri' for Coffee Products, Finding Prima Facie Case of Passing Off Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The case involves a trademark dispute between M/s. Cothas Coffee Co. (plaintiff/respondent) and M/s. Avighna Coffee Pvt. Ltd. (defendant/appellant). T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — 'Cothagiri' Mark Deceptively Similar to 'Cothas'. Defendant restrained from using mark 'cothagiri' for coffee products as it is phonetically and structurally similar to plaintiff's registered trademark 'Cothas'.

The case involves a trademark infringement dispute between two coffee companies. The appellant, M/s Avighna Coffee Pvt. Ltd., was the defendant in the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Division Bench Hears State Appeals Against Single Judge Order Quashing Development Charge Deduction. The Single Judge had declared that applying a blanket 33.33% deduction towards development charges in land acquisition compensation awards was impermissible without justification.

The High Court of Judicature at Madras heard three connected writ appeals filed by the State of Tamil Nadu and its officials against a common order da...