COMPANY APPEAL NOS. 1 to 7 of 2015
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "firm name"
2391 result(s) found
Found 2391 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Contempt Order in Arbitration Dispute — Upholds Finding of Willful Disobedience of Court Orders. Failure to Provide Additional Facility to Employees Constitutes Contempt Despite Claim of Unnecessary Expenditure.
31 Jan 2017The case involves an appeal against an order dated 24th April 2007 passed by a single judge of the Bombay High Court in Contempt Petition No. 01 of 20...
- 50
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator by Unregistered Partnership Firm Under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Bar Under Section 69(2) of Indian Partnership Act, 1932 Does Not Apply to Arbitration Proceedings as They Are Not Suits to Enforce Rights.
1 Feb 2019The petitioners, M/s. Sri Vishal Bhavan, an unregistered partnership firm, and its partner H.N. Jayaprakash, filed a petition under Section 11(6) of t...
- 58
Supreme Court
Supreme Court of India Hears Appeals Against Bombay High Court Judgment Concerning Auction Sale Validity Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Key Issue: Whether Violation of Rule 107(11)(h) of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Rules, 1961 Renders Sale Void Despite Creditor's Waiver, to be Decided.
1 Jan 1970The dispute arises from recovery proceedings initiated by Mahanagar Co-operative Bank against a partnership firm, M/s. Borse Brothers, for defaulting ...
- 49
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Election Petition Challenging the Election of Returned Candidate from Mumbai North Parliamentary Constituency on Grounds of Improper Acceptance of Nomination Due to Non-Disclosure of Assets. Petitioner Alleges Material Effect on Election Outcome by Suppression of Information Under Representation of the People Act, 1950.
30 Nov 2018The election petition was filed in the Bombay High Court under Sections 100(1)(d)(i) and 100(1)(d)(iv) of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, ...
- 64
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trade Name Dispute Over 'Bhagat Tarachand' — Plaintiff Establishes Prima Facie Case of Proprietorship and Likelihood of Confusion. The court restrained defendants from using the trade name 'Bhagat Tarachand' or any deceptively similar name in their restaurant business at Inorbit Mall, Vashi, pending suit.
25 Aug 2010The plaintiff, Vanita Dilip Chawla, filed a suit seeking a declaration that she is the registered proprietor of the trade name 'Bhagat Tarachand' and ...
- 54
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeals by Sahara Companies on SEBI's Regulatory Powers Over OFCDs. Case centers on Section 55A(b) Companies Act and compliance with DIP Guidelines for issuance of optionally fully convertible debentures.
1 Aug 2026The case involved two Sahara Group companies, Sahara India Real Estate Corporation Limited (SIRECL) and Sahara Housing Investment Corporation Limited ...
- 110
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Revision and Restores Rejection of Plaint in Suit Based on Unregistered Agreement. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Fails as Agreement Not Produced and Suit Time-Barred Under Article 58 of Limitation Act, 1963.
17 Feb 2024The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by Ajmera Enterprises (the applicant) against an order of the appellate court which had set aside...
- 72
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Block Assessment Case — Tribunal's Finding of No Jurisdiction Upheld. Assessment under Section 158BD of Income Tax Act, 1961 Requires Satisfaction Recorded by Assessing Officer and Warrant of Authorization in Name of Assessee.
14 Feb 2012The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax-I against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The respondent, Shri Gopinath M...
- 158
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Council of Architecture's Appeal, Upholds That Section 37 of Architects Act Only Prohibits Use of Title 'Architect'. Government Posts Titled 'Architect' Can Be Held by Unregistered Individuals as the Act Does Not Prohibit Practice of Architecture.
17 Mar 2020The Supreme Court considered appeals against the Allahabad High Court's judgment that Section 37 of the Architects Act, 1972 only prohibits unregister...
- 368
