Search Results for "employee provident fund"

653 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 653 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Writ Petition for Regularization of Services of Gram Panchayat Employee; Examines Applicability of Umadevi (2006) 4 SCC 1 to Long-Serving Gram Panchayat Employees.

The petitioner, a retired Gram Panchayat employee, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a mandamus to...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Telecom Company in Industrial Dispute, Holding Regional Business Head Not a 'Workman' Under Industrial Disputes Act. Managerial and Supervisory Duties Exclude Employee from Section 2(s) Definition Despite Absence of Power to Appoint or Dismiss.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s Bharti Airtel Limited against the judgment of the Karnataka High Court which had held that the respo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of DTC Employee Seeking Pension for Lack of Minimum Qualifying Service. Leave Without Pay Period Excluded from Pensionable Service Under Rule 21 of Central Civil Services Pension Rules, 1972.

The appellant, Karan Singh, was a conductor with the Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC). He was appointed as a monthly rate conductor w.e.f. 27th Novem...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Settlement in Industrial Dispute for Breach of Section 12 of Industrial Disputes Act and Rule 11 of Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules. Settlement Dated 5.9.2008 Quashed as Void Ab Initio for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Conciliation Procedure.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions challenging a settlement dated 5.9.2008 arrived at in conciliation between NRC Limited (the company) and NRC ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Labour Commissioner's Order Under Section 33C(1) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Recovery Certificate for Backwages Upheld Despite Bank's Claim of Limitation and Set-Off

The petitioner, The Goa Urban Co-operative Bank Ltd., challenged an order dated 24/03/2017 passed by the Labour Commissioner under Section 33C(1) of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Recovery Orders for Excess Salary Paid to Retired Government Employee — Employee Not at Fault for Wrong Pay Fixation. Recovery of excess salary impermissible when promotional orders stand, following precedent in Gajanan Prabhakarrao Pande v. Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran.

The dispute arose from a service matter involving a retired employee of Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran who challenged recovery of alleged excess salar...