Search Results for "doubtful recovery"

1256 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1256 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Devidas Tulsiram Mankar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhandara for the murder of the deceased under Section 302 of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Criminal Appeals Against Conviction in MCOCA Special Case No.1 of 2006. Accused-Appellants Were Convicted Under Various IPC and MCOCA Sections for Kidnapping for Ransom and Murder; Appeals Heard and Disposed by Common Judgment.

The case involved the abduction, ransom demand, and murder of Sagar Sahani, son of businessman Satinder Sahani. On 14 August 2005, Sagar was abducted ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Finds Prosecution Failed to Establish Motive in Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 302 IPC. Circumstantial Evidence Incomplete; Court Stresses Need for Chain Excluding Innocence and Proper Opportunity Under Section 313 Cr.P.C.

The criminal appeal arose from a conviction for patricide. The appellant, Surdas Balkrishna Kirgat, was tried and convicted by the Principal Sessions ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Procedure. Recovery of 100 grams smack fails as prosecution did not prove samples were drawn from entire contraband and seals were not properly affixed, violating Sections 8 and 21 of NDPS Act.

The appellant, was convicted by the Trial Court under Sections 8 and 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) for all...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reviews Conviction of Accused in Dacoity Case. Appeal Raises Questions on Identification of Accused and Seizure of Cash Under Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Arms Act, 1959.

This criminal appeal arose from Sessions Case No. 26/2003 where the appellant (original accused No. 4) was convicted for dacoity under sections 395, 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Recovery of Dead Body Pursuant to Disclosure Statement. Section 106 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 applied to hold accused liable for facts within their special knowledge.

The appeals arise from a common judgment of the Sikkim High Court maintaining the conviction and sentence of the appellants for the murder of Netai Mo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in UAPA Case on Ground of Parity and Long Incarceration. Appellant in Custody for Over 5 Years with No Imminent Trial Conclusion.

The appellant, Vaibhav Subhash Raut, was arrested in connection with CR No. 11 of 2018 registered at Kalachowki Police Station for alleged offences un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration and Weak Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sanjay Namdeo Gaikwad, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 for the murder of his wife, Umabai, and sentenced...