Search Results for "delayed claim"

1896 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1896 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Delay in FIR Not Fatal to Claim Petition. Mere delay in lodging FIR cannot be a ground to dismiss a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 when the claimant was hospitalized and unable to lodge FIR promptly.

The appellant, Makwana Ajmelbhai Kanabhai, filed a claim petition under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 seeking compensation of Rs. 3,00,000 for injuries...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Dispute — Compensation for Delay Upheld. Majority Award on Claim for Losses Due to Delay Not Perverse or Contrary to Contract Terms Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Chief Engineer (Special Projects), Public Works Department, and the Executive Engineer, filed a petition under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Initiate Criminal Complaint for Alleged Offences Under IPC. Court holds that mere filing of civil suit and criminal complaint does not warrant initiation of proceedings under Section 340 CrPC without prima facie satisfaction of offence.

The appellant, Arun Kumar Sharma, filed a criminal appeal under Section 341 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment and orde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute. Court upholds single judge's refusal to set aside award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that findings of fact by arbitrator are not open to challenge.

The Union of India (appellant) had invited tenders for construction work, and Moti Enterprises (respondent) was the successful tenderer. The contract ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commercial Arbitration Dispute. Court upholds award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no patent illegality or conflict with public policy.

The petitioner, Ramakrishnan Krishnan, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Challenge to Commercial Court’s Dismissal of Section 34 Petitions Upholding Arbitral Awards on Escalation Claims. Dispute Arises Out of Delays in Five Hospital Renovation Projects Undertaken by Contractor and Alleged Breach of Contract by Government Entities.

The appellant, a contractor, was the successful bidder for 14 projects relating to the renovation and expansion of various government hospitals in Kar...