Search Results for "compensation"

11477 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 11477 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — No Enhancement Granted for Lack of Evidence. Market value determined based on sale instances and classification of land as 'dry crop' under Section 23 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case pertains to an appeal against the judgment of the Reference Court in land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Rape of Minor in Rape Case — Conviction Based on Consistent Testimony of Victim and Medical Evidence. Appellant convicted under Section 376(2)(f) IPC for raping an 11-year-old girl; appeal dismissed as prosecution proved case beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Mohamed Farid Jafer Shaikh, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for offences under Sections 376(2)(f), 342, 363 read w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MCGM's Challenge to MERC Regulation on Compensation for Delayed Electricity Connections. Regulation 4.10 requiring compensation for failure to provide new connections within stipulated time is held valid under Section 181 read with Section 57 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), a statutory corporation and local authority, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Consti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MCGM's Challenge to MERC Regulation on Compensation for Delayed Electricity Connections. Regulation 4.10 requiring distribution licensees to pay compensation for failure to provide new connections within stipulated period is valid and not ultra vires the Electricity Act, 2003.

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (MCGM), through its Brihanmumbai Electric Supply & Transport Undertaking (BES&T), filed a writ petition un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Appeals by Insurance Company and Owner in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Driver Upheld. Compensation Award of Rs. 7,50,000 Confirmed Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the legal representatives of Balkrushna Khandagale, who died in a collision between a motorcycle ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Legal Heir Challenging Recovery of Fine and Compensation Imposed on Deceased Accused in Cheque Dishonour Case. Liability to Pay Fine and Compensation Survives Death of Offender Under Section 70 IPC and Can Be Recovered from Inherited Property.

The petitioner, Smt. Shamim Saifuddin Sarkhot, challenged an order dated 19.12.2015 passed by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Shrivardhan, direct...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Accident Claim - Apportions Liability Equally Between Two Insurers. Offending vehicle insured with two companies; court directs both to pay compensation jointly and severally under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The appellants, Gopalrao Punjaji Gayki and Smt. Kalpana Gopalrao Gayki...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Claim — Deemed Passenger Status Upheld. Death of a person found on railway premises with a valid ticket is an 'untoward incident' under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989, and the burden to prove negligence or self-inflicted injury lies on the railway.

The case involves an appeal by the dependents of Kiran Yennam, who died in an alleged untoward incident on 04.03.2010. The claimants, his wife, minor ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Railway Accident Death Case. Claimants failed to establish wrongful act, neglect or default on part of railway administration to claim compensation over and above the statutory amount under Section 124A of the Railways Act, 1989.

The appellants, parents of the deceased Siju S. Vallikalayil, filed a claim before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, seeking compensation for the d...