Search Results for "Special Land Acquisition Officer"

2072 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2072 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Enhanced Compensation for Land Acquired for Tillari Irrigation Project — Market Value Fixed at Rs. 200 per sqm Based on Comparable Sale Deed. Claimants' Appeal for Further Enhancement Dismissed as Reference Court's Deduction of 20% for Development Was Reasonable.

The judgment arises from two cross-appeals challenging the Award dated 15th September 2005 passed by the Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — No Enhancement of Compensation for Acquired Land. Appellants failed to prove entitlement to enhanced market value of Rs.2500 per sq. metre under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appellants, owners of land acquired for road construction in Margao, Goa, challenged the compensation awarded by the Land Acquisition Officer at R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit Challenging Slum Land Acquisition as Barred by Section 42 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act — Preliminary Issue of Bar of Suit Decided in Favor of Defendant No.5.

The suit was filed by the Plaintiffs seeking a declaration of ownership of a plot of land and challenging its acquisition by the State Government unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Violation of Natural Justice under MRTP Act. Demolition Notice Quashed as Issued Without Show Cause Notice or Hearing.

The petitioners, five individuals, filed a writ petition challenging a demolition notice issued by the Municipal Council, Kinwat, under Section 52 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for MIHAN Project — Upholds Validity of Notifications Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court holds that substantial compliance with Section 4(1) and Section 6 is sufficient and challenge after award is barred by delay and laches.

The petitioners, Bhawarlal Shankarlal Sarda and Lasmikant Shankarlal Sarda, filed two writ petitions challenging the land acquisition proceedings init...