WRIT PETITION NO.9189 of 2010
5 May 2011The matter arose out of a dispute over the setting up of a new private sugar factory. Khandoba Prasanna Sakhar Karkhana Limited and Sahyadri Sahakari ...
Search Results for "Original Application"
16796 result(s) found
Found 16796 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Panchayat No Confidence Motion Case Due to Invalid Membership Based on Caste Certificate Non-Compliance. Member's Failure to Submit Validity Certificate Within Mandatory Period Under Section 10-1A of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 Results in Retrospective Termination of Election, Making No Confidence Motion Valid.
21 Apr 2025The dispute centered on the validity of a No Confidence Motion against the Sarpanch of Jambulani Gram Panchayat, which hinged on whether Appellant No....
- 409
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Bike Taxi Aggregator to Operate Pending Policy Formulation — Motor Vehicles Act Does Not Prohibit Two-Wheeler Transport. Court holds that the absence of a state policy for bike taxis does not render the service illegal, and the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 permits contract carriage permits for two-wheelers.
20 Jan 2023The petitioners, Roppen Transportation Services Pvt Ltd (an aggregator operating bike taxis under the brand 'Rapido') and its director Shantanu Sharma...
- 183
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Labour Court Awards in Industrial Dispute Cases. Reinstatement with Back Wages Upheld for Workmen Found to Have Completed 240 Days of Service and Terminated Without Compliance with Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
25 Jun 2021The judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions filed by Duncan Engineering Ltd. (erstwhile Schrader Duncan Ltd.) challenging separate awards passe...
- 83
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Application for Cancellation of Anticipatory Bail and Declines Inquiry Against Sessions Judge for Delay. Court Lays Down Guidelines for Expeditious Disposal of Anticipatory Bail Applications Under Section 438 CrPC.
20 Dec 2012The applicant, Kashinath Jairam Shetye, filed a criminal application before the Bombay High Court at Goa seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail gra...
- 138
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revision Against Execution Orders — Decree Holder Entitled to Possession Despite Alleged Non-Joinder of Necessary Parties. Execution Court Cannot Go Behind Decree; Objections Under Section 47 CPC Not Maintainable.
14 Mar 2019The applicants (judgment-debtors) filed a civil revision application challenging two orders dated 31/07/2018 and 30/10/2018 passed by the Senior Civil...
- 106
High Court
Gujarat High Court Quashes Collector's Order in N.A. Proceedings for Violation of Natural Justice — Directs Fresh Consideration Under Section 65 of Gujarat Land Revenue Code. Failure to Provide Personal Hearing and Consider Relevant Material Renders Orders Unsustainable.
17 Feb 2026The petitioners, Taraben Somabhai Patel and others, filed two Special Civil Applications under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India befor...
- 48
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Atrocities Act Case Due to Lack of Jurisdiction — Civil Judge Cannot Direct Police Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC in a Civil Suit. The order passed by the Civil Judge (J.D.) directing investigation under Section 156(3) CrPC in a civil suit is without jurisdiction and the consequential FIR is liable to be quashed.
24 Mar 2017The applicants, Harischandra Vishwanath Chavan and Santosh Harischandra Chavan, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal...
- 31
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Heirship Certificate Case Under Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827 — Will Not Proved as Attesting Witness Failed to Establish Execution. The Court held that the attesting witness did not depose about the execution of the Will as required under Section 68 of the Evidence Act, 1872 read with Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, and thus no error apparent on record was shown.
20 Mar 2018The applicants, Baban Ramchandra Shukla, Nalini Vinayakrao Joshi, and Malti Jagannathrao Tembhurne, filed a review application before the Bombay High ...
- 54
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Challenge to Settlement Commission's Jurisdiction in Income Tax Case — Settlement Application Valid Despite Expiry of Section 143(2) Notice Period. The term 'pending assessment' includes cases where return is filed and time for completion of assessment has not expired, even if no notice under Section 143(2) was issued.
30 Aug 2013The Commissioner of Income Tax filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging an order dated 31 December 2012 passed by the I...
- 93
