Search Results for "Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Act"

843 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 843 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Promoter's Appeal in RERA Case, Holding That Acceptance of Delayed Possession Without Protest Does Not Waive Right to Interest Under Section 18 of RERA. Statutory Right to Interest Under RERA Cannot Be Waived by Mere Acceptance of Possession Without a Clear Agreement.

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by CCI Projects Private Limited (the promoter) against an order of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Disqualification in Tender for Supply of Food Kits for Gauri-Ganpati Festival. Technical Evaluation Committee's Decision Upheld as Petitioners Failed to Meet Pre-Qualification Condition PQ5 Requiring Experience in Providing 300 Workers at 70 Places.

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions challenging the disqualification of the petitioners from a tender process for the supply of food ki...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Service Tax Levy on Irrigation Restoration Charges Paid to State Government. State's Collection of Charges for Water Diversion is a Sovereign Function, Not a Taxable Service Under Finance Act, 1994.

The petitioner, Rattan India Power Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Disqualification in Tender for Pumping Machinery at MIDC Water Treatment Plant. Court holds that disqualification based on alleged non-submission of required documents was arbitrary and contrary to tender conditions.

The petitioner, M/s Yogiraj Powertech Pvt. Ltd., participated in a tender process issued by the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Receiver in Execution Under Section 51(d) CPC Despite Property Being Outside Territorial Jurisdiction. Section 39(4) CPC Does Not Bar Appointment of Receiver as It Is an Independent Mode of Execution.

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by the decree-holders, Vistra ITCL (India) Limited and IIRF Holdings III Limited, in an execution applicatio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Official Liquidator's Report in Winding Up of Transpower Engineering Ltd. — Holds Sale by Liquidator is Formal Transfer Not Subject to Differential Premium. Court exercises powers under Section 446(2) of Companies Act, 1956 to waive extension charges claimed by MIDC.

The Official Liquidator filed a report seeking directions regarding the sale of two industrial plots allotted by MIDC to Transpower Engineering Ltd. (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of Plot Allotment and Forfeiture of Earnest Money by MIDC for Violation of Natural Justice. Allotment Cancelled Without Show Cause Notice Held Illegal Under Terms of Allotment Letter and Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, M/s. Magma Agro Products Pvt. Ltd., a registered private limited company engaged in manufacturing agro-based products, applied to the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Official Liquidator's Report Seeking Declaration of Sale as Null and Void in Company Liquidation. Transfer of Leasehold Rights by Company in Liquidation Without Court Sanction Held Invalid Under Section 536(2) of Companies Act, 1956.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the learned Company Judge allowing the Official Liquidator's report seeking a declaration that the sale of immovab...