Search Results for "Division Bench decision"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Division Bench decision"

13157 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 13157 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds That Power Under Section 60 of Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 Is Quasi-Judicial and Requires Speaking Orders. The appellate authority must assign reasons while disposing of appeals under Section 60 of the Maharashtra Police Act, 1951.

21 Apr 2022

The case arose from a reference made by a Division Bench of the Bombay High Court (Coram: Nitin Jamdar & Sarang V. Kotwal, JJ.) which did not agree wi...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay quashes FIR in Immoral Traffic Prevention Act case due to illegal search by unauthorised police officer; upholds similar FIR where search conducted by Special Police Officer. Search without warrant under Section 15 of the Immoral Traffic Prevention Act, 1956 must be by Special Police Officer or Trafficking Police Officer; Assistant Police Inspector not authorised.

15 Oct 2016

Two writ petitions were filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Challenge to MCGM's Condition Requiring No Objection Certificate from Indian Navy for Occupancy Certificate and Development Permission. Petitioners Argue That Imposition of Such Condition is Arbitrary and Without Statutory Sanction.

21 Jun 2019

The case involves two writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution. In Writ Petition No. 229 of 2018, M/s S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Interest on Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Possession Prior to Notification Does Not Bar Interest Under Section 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court held that interest under Section 28 is payable from the date of taking possession, regardless of whether possession precedes the Section 4(1) notification.

18 Apr 2016

The case arises from a land acquisition proceeding where the State of Maharashtra appealed against the Reference Court's award of interest on enhanced...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Interest on Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Possession Prior to Notification Does Not Bar Interest Under Section 28 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court held that interest under Section 28 is payable from the date of taking possession, even if possession precedes the Section 4(1) notification.

18 Apr 2016

The case arises from a land acquisition matter where the State of Maharashtra appealed against the Reference Court's award of interest on enhanced com...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines Validity of Government Circulars on Teacher Seniority Under MEPS Act. Issue Concerns Inter-Se Seniority Between Originally Trained Graduate Teachers and Those Acquiring B.Ed. Later.

9 Apr 2019

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard a batch of writ petitions concerning inter-se seniority between two classes of secondary school assistant...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Notification for Single Post Reservation in Aided College — Reservation of Single Post of Lecturer in Mathematics for SC (Women) Held Invalid as It Violates Rule 14 of Karnataka Education Department Services (General) Rules, 1998. The court held that reserving a single post for a particular category amounts to 100% reservation, which is impermissible under the constitutional scheme and the rules.

17 Apr 2021

The petitioner, Smt. Rashmi M.S., a lecturer at P.E.S. P.U College, Mandya, challenged a notification dated 22nd September 2019 issued by the college,...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Grants Interim Stay on Notification Cancelling Nomination of Chairman of Karnataka State Minorities Commission; Examination of Pleasure Doctrine and Natural Justice Under Sections 4 and 5 of the Act

28 May 2024

The petitioner, Abdul Azeem, a former Chairman of the Karnataka State Minorities Commission, filed a writ petition before the Karnataka High Court und...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Tribunal's Predeposit Order in Central Excise Case — Prima Facie Case for Total Waiver Established. Structural glazing, once erected, becomes immovable property and is not excisable under Heading 76.10 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985.

21 Dec 2011

The appellant, MS Alumayer India Pvt. Ltd., is engaged in fabrication and erection of structural glazing. They purchase aluminum angles/profiles, glas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Letters Patent Appeal Maintainable Against Order in PIL and Validates Judgment Pronouncement by Single Judge After Other Judge Ceases to Hold Office. The court ruled that an order refusing to recall an earlier order in a Public Interest Litigation is a 'judgment' under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent, and a judgment prepared and signed by both judges of a Division Bench can be pronounced by one judge after the other demits office.

28 Feb 2006

The case arose from a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by the appellant concerning environmental issues in Lonavala. A Division Bench of the Bom...

41 42 43 44 45

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)