Search Results for "Arbitration award execution"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Arbitration award execution"

1096 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1096 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Favor of PepsiCo Due to Absence of Valid Arbitration Agreement. The Court Held That Without a Signed Contract Containing an Arbitration Clause, the Arbitrator Lacked Jurisdiction to Entertain the Claim.

17 Apr 2012

The case involves a challenge by PepsiCo India Holding Pvt. Ltd. (Petitioner) against an arbitral award dated 7 January 2010 passed by a sole arbitrat...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition in Execution Proceedings — Attachment of Amount Deposited in Another Suit Not Permissible Without Proper Procedure Under Order 21 Rule 46 CPC. Decree holder cannot bypass execution procedure by seeking attachment of a sum deposited in a different suit under Section 151 CPC without following Order 21 Rule 46 CPC.

19 Jul 2024

The petitioner, Smt. Sarasamma C., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 21.01.2023 passed ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Banking Dispute — Upholds Liability of Company but Sets Aside Award Against Directors for Lack of Evidence. The court held that directors cannot be held personally liable for company debt without personal guarantee or specific evidence under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

17 Mar 2011

The present petition was filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the arbitral award dated 31st March, 2006 p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Arbitration Petitions Challenging Arbitral Award in Dispute Over Supply of Pulverised Fly Ash from Thermal Power Plant. The petitions, filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seek to set aside the award that rejected claims for specific performance and damages arising from an agreement dated 4 October 2000.

24 Jul 2014

The dispute arose from a long-term agreement dated 4 October 2000 between Dirk India Private Limited (Dirk India) and Maharashtra State Electricity Ge...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Arbitral Awards in Software Development Disputes — No Patent Illegality or Perversity Found. Court upholds awards under Section 34 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no grounds for interference with arbitrator's findings on breach of contract and quantum.

16 Jan 2015

The judgment concerns three arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging separate arbitral aw...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Substitution of Arbitrator in CPWD Contract Dispute, Holding Retired Departmental Officers Ineligible Under Amended Arbitration Act. Court Appoints Former Judge as Sole Arbitrator to Resolve Multiple Contractual Disputes Arising from Six Construction Agreements.

19 Sep 2019

The dispute arose from six separate construction contracts awarded by the Central Public Works Department (CPWD) to M/s Sri Krishna Shelters Pvt. Ltd....

High Court

Karnataka High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Condonation of Delay in Filing Arbitration Application Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. Dispute Centers on Whether Limitation Runs from Original Award or Belated Correction Order When Section 33 Application Filed Beyond 30 Days.

15 Jul 2022

The writ petitions challenged the order of the Commercial Court condoning the delay in filing arbitration suits under Section 34 of the Arbitration an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Favour of Contractor in Postal Department Contract Dispute — Claims for Idle Labour, Machinery, and Loss of Profit Held Not Supported by Evidence and Contrary to Contract Terms. The court held that an arbitrator cannot award damages for idle resources or loss of profit without proof of deployment or anticipated profits, and such awards are perverse and patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Feb 2020

The Petitioner, Union of India through the Postal Department, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Interim Order in Development Dispute — Upholds Disclosure Directions but Sets Aside Deposit Orders. The court held that while disclosure orders are permissible under Section 17 of the Arbitration Act, a direction to deposit 30% of sale proceeds without a finding of likelihood of dissipation of assets is not sustainable.

17 Dec 2024

The petitioners, Arun Bhoomi Corporation and Vijay Kanhaiyalal Joshi, filed a Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Film Production Dispute; Rejection of Producer's Damages Claim and Award of Costs Against Actor Stand. Court Finds No Perversity in Arbitrator's Finding That Claimant Failed to Prove Agreement with Gemini Industries, While Breach of Consent Terms Justified Costs of Rs.12 Lakhs.

16 Apr 2015

The dispute arose between Ajay Singh, an actor, and Suneel Darshan, a film producer, regarding the production of a film. In 2007, the parties entered ...

41 42 43 44 45

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)