Search Results for "2021 Office Memorandum"

596 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 596 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Cancellation of GST Registration for Vague Show Cause Notice — Violation of Natural Justice. Show cause notice lacking specific allegations of fraud or suppression of facts renders cancellation order unsustainable under Section 20 of IGST Act read with Section 107 of CGST Act.

The petitioner, Makersburry India Pvt. Ltd., challenged an order dated 26 April 2023 passed by the Deputy Commissioner of State Tax (Appellate Authori...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Madras Partly Allows Appeal by Board in Allotment Dispute — Violation of Ten-Year Alienation Restriction Upheld. Circular Relaxing Such Condition Has Prospective Effect and Non-Allottee Cannot Claim Allotment Under the Scheme.

The case arose from intra-court appeals under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent filed by the Tamil Nadu Slum Clearance Board against a common order of a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Cognizability of Section 63 of Copyright Act in Writ Petition by Cab Aggregator; Issue Involves Classification of Offence Punishable with Imprisonment up to Three Years.

Background: The dispute arose from a complaint filed by Lahari Recording Company (respondent no. 2), a music company, against ANI Technologies Pvt. Lt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Reassessment Notice for Lack of Valid Reason to Believe in Income Tax Case. Failure to Disclose Material Facts Not Established as Petitioner Had Made Full Disclosure Under Income Disclosure Scheme, 2016.

The petitioner, Prabhakar Nerulkar, an individual engaged in real estate business, filed a writ petition challenging a reassessment notice under Secti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Contract Dispute. Court holds that balance of convenience and prima facie case did not favor grant of injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

The Appellant, Chitali Bottling Limited, filed a Special Civil Suit No.95 of 2020 before the 19th Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Pune, seeking a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court hears and determines Notice of Motion No. 1211 of 2014 in Suit No. 777 of 2014 seeking interim injunctions and appointment of administrator. The court examines rival claims of family arrangements and fiduciary capacity over Gopal Raheja Group assets.

The dispute arose out of the affairs of the Gopal Raheja Group, a real estate business originally established by Lachmandas Raheja and continued by hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty Paid on Agreement for Sale That Did Not Materialize Due to Market Downturn. Petitioner entitled to refund under Sections 47 and 48 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 as instrument was not followed by conveyance and no fraud or misrepresentation was involved.

The Petitioner, M/s Shweta Infrastructure and Housing (I) Pvt. Ltd., entered into an agreement for sale on 29 September 2014 with the Khatib family fo...