Search Results for "similarly situated institutions"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "similarly situated institutions"

532 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 532 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Wakf Tribunal Order Declaring Property as Wakf — Madatmash Inam Grant Treated as Wakf Under Hyderabad Inam Abolition Act. The court held that a Madatmash grant for mosque services is wakf by user, and upon abolition, occupancy rights were conferred on the tenant, not the Inamdar, under the Hyderabad Inam and Cash Grants Abolition Act, 1954.

20 Jul 2016

The case involves a civil revision application filed by four applicants (original plaintiffs) against the judgment and order of the Wakf Tribunal, Aur...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Delivers Common Judgment in Batch of Writ Petitions Against State of Maharashtra and Forest Authorities Concerning Land Rights. The Petitioners Challenge Actions of the Revenue and Forest Departments Regarding Classification and Possession of Lands.

1 Jan 1970

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Petitions Against Industrial Court Order Granting Permanency to Daily Wage Workers in Social Forestry Scheme. Services Rendered During Pendency of Complaint Under Interim Order Count for Continuous Service.

20 Sep 2024

The judgment arises from a batch of writ petitions filed by the Deputy Director, Social Forestry Division, Solapur, challenging an order of the Indust...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions by Tenants Challenging Redevelopment of Dilapidated Building. Tenants' objections under DCPR 2034 rejected as redevelopment was approved by majority and TAC.

4 May 2023

The Bombay High Court dismissed seven writ petitions filed by tenants of a building named 'Haji Manzil' located in Bandra, Mumbai. The building, const...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Partially Allows State's Appeal and Dismisses Claimants' Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case. Compensation for Acquired Land Reduced from ₹207 to ₹150 per sq. Metre Due to Lack of Comparable Evidence Under Section 23 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

4 Feb 2022

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a land acquisition matter. The State, through the Executive Engineer, appealed against the Reference ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Area of Acquired Land Determined as 6750 sq.mtrs with Enhanced Compensation and Interest. The court upheld the Reference Court's finding on area but modified compensation and interest under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

26 Aug 2005

The case involves two appeals arising from a common judgment of the Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Satara in Land Reference No.22/87 dated 5.2.19...

High Court

Bombay High Court Enhances Compensation in Land Acquisition Case for Metro Centre Project. Claimant's Appeal Partly Allowed; State's Appeal Dismissed.

1 Sep 2005

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a land acquisition reference. The claimant, Arvind Bhaskar Limaye, owned land in Survey No.48/B admea...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal by Acquiring Department in Land Acquisition Case — Market Value Fixed at ₹90 per sq.mt. Upheld. Reference Court's enhancement from ₹3 to ₹90 per sq.mt. based on comparable sale instances and location of orchard land near village Candola under Section 4(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

12 Oct 2017

The case involves a first appeal by the Land Acquisition Officer and the Executive Engineer (the Acquiring Department) against the Judgment and Award ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Unexplained Delay and Unworkability - Restores Parties to Original Positions Under Article 142. Unexplained delay of over three years in pronouncing award and failure to finally settle disputes renders award contrary to public policy under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

1 Jan 2025

The Supreme Court of India considered two civil appeals arising from an arbitral award that was reserved on 28.07.2012 but pronounced only on 16.03.20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act in Support of LMAA Arbitration — Respondent Directed to Furnish Bank Guarantee for Admitted Demurrage Liability. The court held that where liability is admitted and payment is defaulted, the petitioner is entitled to security pending arbitration.

2 Jul 2026

The petitioner, Norvic Shipping Asia PTE Limited, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking interim prot...

40 41 42 43 44

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)