High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal by Acquiring Department in Land Acquisition Case — Market Value Fixed at ₹90 per sq.mt. Upheld. Reference Court's enhancement from ₹3 to ₹90 per sq.mt. based on comparable sale instances and location of orchard land near village Candola under Section 4(1) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: GOA In Favour of Accused
  • 55
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involves a first appeal by the Land Acquisition Officer and the Executive Engineer (the Acquiring Department) against the Judgment and Award dated 21/12/2013 passed by the District Judge-I, North Goa, Panaji in Land Acquisition Case No.2/2007. The land of the respondent, Kalidas Atmaram Savaikar, was acquired for improvement and black topping of the road from Palsari diversion to Tamsuli in Village Panchayat Betki-Candola, Priol Consistency, bearing Survey No.92(part), an orchard land of 1870 sq.mts., pursuant to a Notification dated 28/01/2002 under Section 4(1) of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Land Acquisition Officer awarded total compensation of ₹61,002/- by award dated 15/12/2004. Aggrieved, the respondent filed an application under Section 18 of the Act seeking a reference to the District Court, claiming compensation of ₹100/- per sq.mt. The Reference Court, after examining the material, fixed the market value at ₹90/- per sq.mt. with all statutory benefits including interest. The Acquiring Department appealed, challenging the quantum, arguing that the Reference Court grossly erred in enhancing the compensation from ₹3/- per sq.mt. to ₹90/- per sq.mt. in the absence of proper evidence. The High Court, after considering the submissions, dismissed the appeal, upholding the Reference Court's determination of market value at ₹90 per sq.mt. as justified based on comparable sale instances and the location of the land.

Headnote

A) Land Acquisition - Market Value Determination - Enhancement of Compensation - Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Sections 4(1), 18, 23 - The Acquiring Department challenged the enhancement of compensation from ₹3 to ₹90 per sq.mt. for orchard land acquired for road improvement. The Reference Court relied on sale instances and location near village Candola. Held that the enhancement was justified based on comparable sales and the nature of the land (Paras 2-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Reference Court was justified in enhancing the market value of the acquired land from ₹3 per sq.mt. to ₹90 per sq.mt. based on the evidence on record.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the Reference Court's award fixing market value at ₹90 per sq.mt. with all statutory benefits.

Law Points

  • Market value determination
  • Comparable sale instances
  • Orchard land valuation
  • Section 4(1) notification date
  • Land Acquisition Act
  • 1894
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (BOM) (10) 115

First Appeal No.83 of 2015

2017-10-12

Nutan D. Sardessai, J.

Ms. Priyanka Kamat, Additional Government Advocate for the Appellants; Shri D. Pangam with Shri L. Fernandes, Advocates for the respondents

Land Acquisition Officer, P.W.D. Cell, Altinho, Panaji, Goa and The Executive Engineer Works Division XVIII(R) Ponda Goa

Shri Kalidas Atmaram Savaikar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

First appeal by Acquiring Department against enhancement of compensation in land acquisition case.

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought to set aside the Reference Court's award enhancing compensation from ₹3 to ₹90 per sq.mt.

Filing Reason

Appellants challenged the quantum of compensation fixed by the Reference Court as excessive and without proper evidence.

Previous Decisions

Land Acquisition Officer awarded ₹61,002/- total compensation (approx ₹3 per sq.mt.) on 15/12/2004; Reference Court enhanced to ₹90 per sq.mt. on 21/12/2013.

Issues

Whether the Reference Court erred in enhancing the market value from ₹3 per sq.mt. to ₹90 per sq.mt.?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants argued that the Reference Court grossly erred in enhancing compensation in the absence of proper evidence. Respondent supported the Reference Court's decision based on comparable sale instances and location.

Ratio Decidendi

The enhancement of compensation was justified based on comparable sale instances and the nature of the land as orchard land near a village, and the Reference Court's determination of market value at ₹90 per sq.mt. was not erroneous.

Judgment Excerpts

The learned Reference Court on an examination of the material before it had fixed the market value of the acquired land on the date of the Section 4(1) Notification at ₹90/-per sq.mt. with all the statutory benefits including interest in terms of the Act giving rise to the appeal at the instance of the Acquiring Department challenging the said quantum in the respondent's favour.

Procedural History

Notification under Section 4(1) dated 28/01/2002; Award by Land Acquisition Officer on 15/12/2004; Reference under Section 18 filed by respondent; Reference Court judgment on 21/12/2013; First Appeal filed by Acquiring Department on 12/10/2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Land Acquisition Act, 1894: Section 4(1), Section 18, Section 23
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal by Acquiring Department in Land Acquisition Case — Market Value Fixed at ₹90 per sq.mt. Upheld. Reference Court's enhancement from ₹3 to ₹90 per sq.mt. based on comparable sale instances and locati...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Company Petition — Interim Relief Granted to Restrain Alienation of Property. Balance of convenience favored grant of ad-interim relief to protect subject matter of petition under Sections 397, 398 of Companies Ac...