Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act in Support of LMAA Arbitration — Respondent Directed to Furnish Bank Guarantee for Admitted Demurrage Liability. The court held that where liability is admitted and payment is defaulted, the petitioner is entitled to security pending arbitration.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Norvic Shipping Asia PTE Limited, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking interim protection in support of arbitration proceedings pending before the London Maritime Arbitrators Association (LMAA). The dispute arose from a Repayment Schedule Agreement dated 9 January 2025, under which the respondent, Zigma International, admitted liability of USD 215,310.01 towards demurrage. The agreement provided for payment in installments, with a clause that failure to pay any installment would render the entire balance payable. The first installment fell due on 15 January 2025, but the respondent failed to make any payment despite reminders. The petitioner argued that the liability was admitted and sought an order directing the respondent to furnish security. The court noted that the respondent did not dispute the liability and had not paid any amount. The court held that the petitioner had made out a strong prima facie case and that the balance of convenience was in favor of granting interim relief. The court directed the respondent to furnish a bank guarantee for the full amount of USD 215,310.01 within four weeks, failing which the petitioner would be at liberty to apply for attachment of the respondent's assets. The petition was disposed of accordingly.

Headnote

A) Arbitration - Interim Measures - Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Admitted Liability - The court considered a petition under Section 9 seeking interim protection in support of LMAA arbitration in London. The dispute arose from a Repayment Schedule Agreement dated 9 January 2025, where the respondent admitted liability of USD 215,310.01 for demurrage. The court held that since liability was admitted and the respondent failed to pay installments, the petitioner was entitled to security. The court directed the respondent to furnish a bank guarantee of USD 215,310.01 within four weeks, failing which the petitioner could seek attachment. (Paras 1-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to interim protection under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, in support of foreign-seated arbitration proceedings, when the respondent has admitted liability under a repayment schedule agreement.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court directed the respondent to furnish a bank guarantee for USD 215,310.01 within four weeks from the date of the order. If the respondent fails to furnish the bank guarantee, the petitioner is at liberty to apply for attachment of the respondent's assets. The petition is disposed of.

Law Points

  • Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act
  • 1996
  • interim measures
  • admitted liability
  • bank guarantee
  • LMAA arbitration
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (07) 36

Commercial Arbitration Petition (L) No. 15734 of 2026

2026-07-02

Amit Borkar, J.

Mr. Kunal Vaishnav with Mr. Vinay V. Vishwanathan i/by Renata Partners LLP for the petitioner; Mr. Ashwin Shanker with Mr. Santosh Koli, and Ms. Diksha Brahma for the respondent.

Norvic Shipping Asia PTE Limited

Zigma International

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim protection in support of foreign-seated arbitration proceedings.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought an order directing the respondent to furnish security for the admitted demurrage liability of USD 215,310.01.

Filing Reason

Respondent failed to pay installments under a Repayment Schedule Agreement dated 9 January 2025, despite admitting liability.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 when the respondent has admitted liability but failed to pay.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the respondent admitted liability under Clause 2 of the Repayment Schedule Agreement and agreed to a payment schedule, but defaulted on the first installment due 15 January 2025, and no payment has been made despite reminders. Respondent did not dispute the liability or the default.

Ratio Decidendi

Where a party admits liability under a repayment schedule agreement and defaults on payment, the other party is entitled to interim security under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, pending arbitration, as a strong prima facie case and balance of convenience favor granting such relief.

Judgment Excerpts

The present petition is filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act. It is filed to seek interim protection in support of arbitration proceedings which are going on before the LMAA at London. According to the petitioner, there is no dispute about the liability. It is pointed out that under Clause 2 of the Repayment Schedule Agreement, the respondent accepted that an amount of USD 215,310.01 was payable towards demurrage. The petitioner has stated that the first installment became due on 15 January 2025. However, according to the petitioner, the respondent did not make the payment though several reminders and emails were sent. The court directed the respondent to furnish a bank guarantee for USD 215,310.01 within four weeks.

Procedural History

The petition was filed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, in support of LMAA arbitration proceedings. The court reserved judgment on 19 June 2026 and pronounced it on 2 July 2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996: Section 9
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Interim Relief Under Section 9 of Arbitration Act in Support of LMAA Arbitration — Respondent Directed to Furnish Bank Guarantee for Admitted Demurrage Liability. The court held that where liability is admitted and payment ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Foreign Nationals in NDPS Case — No Recovery from Petitioners, Only Co-accused Implicated. Petitioners not named in FIR and no contraband recovered from them, thus Section 37 NDPS Act bar not applicable...