Search Results for "sentence upheld"

2712 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2712 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Robbery and Arms Act Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 392, 506 IPC and Sections 25(1A), 27(1) Arms Act set aside as sole eyewitness's testimony was inconsistent and no public witness was examined.

The appellant, Bhimaraya @ Bhimanna, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Yadgir in Sessions Case No. 06/2012 for offences punishable under Sections 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Criminal Appeals Against Conviction Under Section 302 and 380 IPC. Appellants’ Conviction and Life Imprisonment Upheld Based on Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Together and Recovery of Stolen Ornaments.

The case involves two criminal appeals filed by accused Nos. 1 and 2 against their conviction and sentence for the murder of the informant’s wife an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Appeals Against Conviction Under Sections 302, 307, 325, 324, 452 r/w 149 of IPC in a Village Faction Murder Case; Holds That Evidence of Interested Witnesses Cannot Be Mechanically Rejected and Must Be Evaluated Cautiously

The appeals arose from a judgment dated September 24, 2009, passed by the Sessions Judge, Gadchiroli, in Sessions Case No. 109 of 2003, convicting 13 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Attempt to Murder and Causing Disappearance of Evidence in Domestic Assault Case. Appellant convicted under Sections 307 and 201 IPC for stabbing his wife multiple times with a knife, causing grievous injuries.

The appellant, Arvind S/o Kanjibhai Rajpopat, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-6, Nagpur, for offences under Sections 307 (attempt to mu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction but Reduces Sentence in Robbery Case Involving False Customs Identification. Identification by witness in T.I. Parade and recovery of stolen money from accused upheld as sufficient evidence for conviction under Sections 395 and 412 IPC.

The Supreme Court heard two criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the Calcutta High Court, which had confirmed the conviction of Jahangir...