WRIT PETITION NO.8952 OF 2009
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "preliminary decision"
4744 result(s) found
Found 4744 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Trial Court Order Allowing Production of Documents Without Affidavit in Partition Suit — Memo Without Leave Under Order VIII Rule 1A CPC Cannot Be Entertained.
7 Oct 2015The petitioners filed a suit for partition and separate possession (O.S.No.696/2008) in the Court of Principal Civil Judge, Mangalore. The defendants ...
- 79
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Appellate Officer's Order Under Maharashtra Housing & Area Development Act. The Judgment Text Is Truncated and Does Not Contain the Court's Final Disposition or Legal Findings.
6 Nov 2019The Mumbai Building Repairs and Reconstruction Board, a unit of the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (MHADA), filed a series of eigh...
- 11
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Petition Seeking Security for Enhanced Call Price in Share Purchase Dispute — Holds That Emergency Arbitrator's Decision Is Binding and Cannot Be Bypassed by Seeking Parallel Interim Relief from Court. The court found that the petitioners were attempting to circumvent the emergency arbitrator's decision by seeking a different form of security or additional relief, which would undermine the arbitral process.
8 Oct 2024The petitioners, Ashok Kumar Goel and Vyoman India Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, se...
- 565
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Challenge to Settlement Signed with Minority Workers, Upholds Company's Right to Enter into Settlement Under Section 18(1) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Settlement signed with 9 workers on a holiday is valid as it was signed in the presence of Conciliation Officer and no fraud or coercion was proved.
24 Feb 2018The judgment concerns two writ petitions: one by Hindustan Lever Employees Union challenging a settlement signed by Hindustan Unilever Limited with 9 ...
- 142
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition on Removal from TPE Caution List: Alleged Violation of Natural Justice and Procedural Guidelines. Court Reserves Orders after Considering Petitioner's Grievance Regarding Inclusion in Caution List Without Proper Forum Evaluation.
24 Feb 2026The petitioner, a chartered engineer and government-approved valuer, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India see...
- 43
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging School Tribunal's Order on Jurisdiction in Service Dispute of Assistant Teacher Seeking Head Master Post. The court held that the School Tribunal has jurisdiction to entertain an appeal by an Assistant Teacher against the management's decision to appoint another teacher as In-charge Head Master under the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977.
6 Apr 2016The petitioner, Babar Manohar Sonyabapu, was appointed as an Assistant Teacher in respondent no.3 Night High School on 14 June 1993. On 30 June 2008, ...
- 108
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Defamation Suit Against Azim Premji for Lack of Authority to File on Behalf of Company. Managing Director's Authority to Sue Required Board Resolution as per Articles of Association.
12 May 2016The suit was filed by Subhiksha Trading Services Ltd. (Plaintiff No.1) and its Managing Director R. Subramanian (Plaintiff No.2) against Azim Premji a...
- 219
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Land Acquisition Challenge for Malaprabha Project Due to Delay and Laches. Petitioners' challenge to Section 4(1) and Section 6(1) notifications under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 dismissed as they failed to explain delay of over 4 years.
6 Oct 2015The petitioners, 26 individuals from Gonnagar Village, Ramdurg Taluk, Belgaum District, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constit...
- 40
High Court
Madras High Court Modifies Preliminary Decree in Partition Suit, Applies Vineetha Sharma Principles Under Hindu Succession Act. Daughter Entitled to 1/9 Share as Coparcener Under Central Act 39 of 2005, Irrespective of Father's Death Before 2005 and Regardless of Date of Marriage.
14 Jul 2026The judgment arises from a first appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the preliminary decree dated 25.02.2016 pas...
- 18
