Search Results for "party respondent"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "party respondent"

16454 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 16454 result(s)

High Court

High Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Company Law Board Order in Oppression and Mismanagement Case — Upholds CLB's Discretion to Grant Interim Relief Under Section 402 of Companies Act, 1956. The court held that the CLB has wide powers to pass interim orders to prevent oppression and mismanagement, and such orders are not final determinations of rights.

13 Aug 2013

The Union of India, through the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, filed an appeal under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956, against an interim order ...

High Court

KAHC010100302020_1

2 Dec 2021

The petitioners, a group of renewable energy companies, filed multiple writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Alleged Wilful Disobedience of Order to Vacate Premises — Failure to File Undertaking and Pay Dues Not Contempt as Substantive Compliance Achieved.

6 May 2020

The contempt petition was filed by Hukum Chand Deswal (petitioner) against Satish Raj Deswal (respondent) alleging wilful disobedience of the Supreme ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Section 9 Petition as Misuse of Process in Redevelopment Dispute with Non-Member Occupant. Court holds that a developer cannot seek interim relief against a non-signatory occupant under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, where the occupant has independent rights and is not bound by the arbitration agreement.

30 Sep 2024

The petitioner, Gulshan Townplanners LLP, a developer, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Arbitral Awards in Software Development Disputes — No Patent Illegality or Perversity Found. Court upholds awards under Section 34 of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, finding no grounds for interference with arbitrator's findings on breach of contract and quantum.

16 Jan 2015

The judgment concerns three arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging separate arbitral aw...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Extension of Toll Collection Period in BOT Road Project. Court holds that concession period extension is a contractual matter and not subject to judicial review under Article 226 in absence of arbitrariness or public interest violation.

17 Oct 2006

The petitioners, claiming to be public-spirited citizens, filed a writ petition in public interest challenging the decision of the State of Maharashtr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petition Against Guarantor Company Due to Bona Fide Dispute and Pendency of DRT Proceedings. Court Finds That Existence of Disputes Regarding Validity of Guarantee and Pending Recovery Proceedings Before DRT Render the Petition Not Maintainable Under Companies Act, 1956.

23 Jun 2016

The petitioner, SICOM Ltd., a financial institution, filed a winding-up petition against the respondent, Entertainment World Developers Pvt. Ltd., und...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Award of 14 January 2006 on Share Valuation Under Clause 7 of Protocol Agreement Challenged on Grounds of Jurisdiction and Legality of the Agreement.

15 Feb 2010

The matter arose from a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by Western Maharashtra Development Corpn. Ltd. c...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Decides Writ Petitions Challenging Communication Barring No-Confidence Motion Against Koppal Zilla Panchayat President. Right to Move No-Confidence Motion Under Section 180 of Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 is Asserted as an Inherent Constitutional Right, Not Dependent on Separate Rules.

27 Aug 2020

The writ petitions were filed by elected members of the Koppal Zilla Panchayat challenging communications from the State of Karnataka and the Regional...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO. 3748 OF 2011

8 Jul 2011

The dispute concerns allocation of natural gas from the KG D6 fields in the Krishna-Godavari Basin, where a significant reduction in production occurr...

40 41 42 43 44

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)