Search Results for "paid"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "paid"

17819 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 17819 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Declares Rule 6(3)(d) of Karnataka Urban Development Authority Rules 1991 as Ultra Vires and Unconstitutional — Refund of Auction Deposit Ordered with Interest. Rule 6(3)(d) allowing forfeiture of deposit without proof of loss was held to be in conflict with Section 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, and thus ultra vires the Constitution.

2 Jan 2013

The petitioners, Shri K Babjan and K Sulaiman, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging Rule 6(3)(d) o...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows CENVAT Credit Claim for Furnace Oil Used in Manufacturing Intermediate Non-Dutiable Product. Furnace oil used to produce Dead Burnt Magnesite (DBM) held to be 'input' for final excisable goods under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2001, as DBM is an intermediate product essential for manufacture of final goods.

25 Jun 2026

The appellant, M/s. Tata Refractories Ltd. (now TRL Krosaki Refractories Limited), is an assessee under the Central Excise Act, 1944. It manufactures ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Customary Puja Bonus Despite Ex Gratia Declarations. Puja Bonus Recognized as Customary Payment When Unbroken Series, Long Period, Uniform Rate, and Paid in Loss Years, Even if Employer Previously Labeled it Ex Gratia.

7 May 1959

The dispute arose between Graham Trading Co. (India) Ltd., the employer, and its workmen regarding the payment of puja bonus for the year 1953. The co...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of First Appellate Court's Decree for Specific Performance of Agreement for Sale. High Court Had Directed Refund of Earnest Money Instead of Specific Performance, Holding That Appellant Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness.

1 Jan 1970

The litigation arose from an agreement for sale dated 08.01.2010, whereby the defendants agreed to sell two items of immovable property to the appella...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Lapse of Land Acquisition Under Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act. Petitioners Claimed Acquisition Lapsed Due to Non-Payment of Compensation and Non-Passing of Award Under Section 24(2) of 2013 Act and Section 11A of 1894 Act.

9 Jan 2018

The matter involved a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India filed by landowners whose agricultural lands in Mahajenaha...

High Court

Madras High Court Considers Appeal Against Order Setting Aside Arbitral Award in Berth Reservation Dispute. Court Examines Whether the Claim Was Barred by Limitation and Whether the Award Was Patently Illegal Under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Mar 2026

The judgment of the Madras High Court in OSA (CAD) No. 39 of 2021 involved an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, a...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Appeal Against Company Law Board Order in Oppression and Mismanagement Petition. Company Appeal No.19 of 2009 Challenges CLB's Findings on Reduction of Shareholding, Removal of Director, and Valuation of Land Under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956.

21 Sep 2015

The case involved a dispute between shareholders of Pantheon Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd., a company formed to acquire and develop a 13-acre property in M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Petitioner Company in Reduction of Share Capital Case Under Sections 100-104 of Companies Act, 1956. Court-Ordered Valuation Found Plausible; Minority Objectors Failed to Prove Unfairness.

9 May 2014

Cadbury India Limited filed a petition under Sections 100 to 104 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking sanction of a special resolution for reduction of...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Directs Re-adjudication of 21 Employees' Claims; Dispute on Interest and Bonus Under Winding-Up Not Resolved in Extracted Judgment Text. The court granted partial relief by allowing prayer (b) for re-adjudication of claims of 21 workmen due to discrepancies, while the final decision on prayer (a) concerning statutory interest, bonus, and provident fund contribution under the Companies Act, 1956 is not discernible from the incomplete text.

4 Aug 2006

The case concerns a company application filed by the Engineering Workers Association, representing 121 employees of M/s. Poysha Industrial Co. Ltd., w...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Purchaser's Originating Summons in Property Agreement Dispute; Holds Payment of Consideration Not Conditional on Vendor's Covenants. Default in Payment Triggered Acceleration Clause Under Clause 1(i) of Agreement, Making Entire Balance Payable and Vendor's Termination Valid.

29 Mar 2012

The dispute arose from an agreement dated 13 June 1978 whereby the defendant vendor agreed to sell a plot of land at Santacruz to the plaintiff builde...

40 41 42 43 44

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)