Search Results for "interlocutory appeals"

681 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 681 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Rules on Stamp Duty Penalty: A Critical Examination of Section 34 of the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957

The Supreme Court of India, in the case of Seetharama Shetty vs. Monappa Shetty, addressed the legal implications of Sections 33, 34, 37, and 39 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Registrar General, Sets Aside High Court Order Quashing Dismissal of Judicial Officer. Disciplinary Proceedings Against Civil Judge Upheld as Enquiry Was Valid and Charges of Misconduct Were Proved.

The case pertains to disciplinary proceedings initiated against a Civil Judge (Junior Division) in Karnataka. The respondent was appointed as a Civil ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against Delhi High Court Order Setting Aside Central Government's Allocation of Raw Pet-Coke. Court Restores Allocation Based on EPCA Recommendations and Production Capacity, Holding That High Court Erred in Interfering with Policy Decisions on Environmental Grounds.

The Supreme Court considered appeals against a Delhi High Court judgment that set aside the Central Government's allocation of imported raw pet-coke (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Electricity Board's Appeals in Illegal Disconnection Case — Board Cannot Claim Charges for Period of Its Own Wrongful Act. Initial Disconnection Without Considering Consumer's Instalment Request Violates Section 56 of Electricity Act, 2003.

The appeals arose from a dispute between the Bihar State Electricity Board (appellant) and M/s Iceberg Industries Ltd. (respondent/company) concerning...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Contempt Petition and Allows Writ Appeals in Tender Cancellation Dispute. Court holds that cancellation of tender due to change in government policy does not amount to willful disobedience of court order under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The case involves a dispute over a tender issued by the State of Karnataka for the selection of a creative agency for the 'Invest Karnataka 2022' even...