Search Results for "individual hardship"

729 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 729 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Suo Motu Reference on Summoning Advocates During Investigation; Examines Scope of Advocate-Client Privilege and Need for Guidelines to Prevent Coercive Summons. Court Addresses Legality of Direct Summons to Lawyers Under Section 179 BNSS and Absence of Judicial Oversight.

The Supreme Court initiated suo motu proceedings following a reference from a two-judge bench in a Special Leave Petition challenging a notice issued ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Reserves Judgment on Writ Petition Challenging Municipal Council Land Allotment. Petitioner Seeks Quashing of Resolutions and Government Approval for Allotment of Land Reserved for Public Purposes Allegedly in Violation of Section 92 of Maharashtra Municipal Councils Act, 1965.

The writ petition, originally filed as a Public Interest Litigation, challenged the decisions of Baramati Municipal Council and the State of Maharasht...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Writ Petition under Articles 226 and 227 seeking to quash CBI FIR for disproportionate assets under Prevention of Corruption Act; the court examined the scope of Section 13 and the effect of investigation delay. Final outcome not available in the provided excerpt.

The writ petition was filed by a sitting MLA and former Minister of Karnataka, who challenged the FIR registered by the Central Bureau of Investigatio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Constitutional Challenge to Development Control Regulation 33(7) Allowing Enhanced FSI for Reconstruction. Petition Filed by Public-Spirited Citizens Claims Regulation Exacerbates Population Congestion in Island City.

This public interest litigation, filed by three public-spirited citizens of Mumbai, challenged the legality of Regulation 33(7) of the Development Con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Builders' Challenge to Provident Fund Coverage of Casual Construction Workers. Para 26(2) Amendment to Provident Fund Scheme Removes Waiting Period, Requiring Membership from Date of Joining.

Three writ petitions were filed by builders—Sandeep Dwellers Pvt. Ltd., M/s. R.B. Constructions, and Builders Association of India with its members�...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Petition Challenging Stop Work Notice by Municipal Corporation and Defence Authorities. Examines if NOC from Defence is Required for Building Completion Under Town Planning and Municipal Acts.

The petitioner, Sea Kunal Corporation Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company, undertook redevelopment of a Category A cessed building known as Rashid Ma...