Search Results for "Taking Over Certificate"

4707 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4707 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Tribe Claim for 'Mannerwarlu' Tribe. Court holds that the Scrutiny Committee failed to consider validated tribe claims of close blood relatives and the principle of stare decisis, directing reconsideration of the petitioner's claim.

The petitioner, Chaitanya Palekar, challenged the order dated 7.7.2022 passed by the Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Verification Committee, Kinwat,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Scrutiny Committee Order Invalidating Scheduled Tribe Claim of Thakar Candidate. Pre-Constitutional School Records and Consistent Entries of 'Thakar' Caste Outweigh Discrepancies in Father's Certificate.

The petitioner, Manisha Thakar, obtained a caste certificate on 12 October 2001 from the Sub-Divisional Officer, Kankavli, declaring her as belonging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Sub-Registrar's Refusal to Delete Agreement of Sale Entry from Encumbrance Certificate. Sub-Registrar Has No Power to Make Entries of Unregistered Agreements of Sale Under Registration Act, 1908, and Cannot Refuse Deletion.

The petitioner, Ramesh Timmanna Umarani, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Seeking Development Rights Certificate for Recreation Ground Amenity Under Regulation 34 of DCR 1991. Owner entitled to TDR for construction upon developing and handing over reserved amenity free of cost.

The petitioners, Godrej & Boyce Manufacturing Co. Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a wri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court heard challenge to deemed conveyance order under MOFA; developer alleged res judicata due to consent decree. Developer contended that Competent Authority lacked jurisdiction under Section 11(3) when consent decree already provided for conveyance.

The writ petition was filed by developers challenging an order of deemed conveyance passed by the Competent Authority under Section 11(3) of the Mahar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Exercises Suo Motu Jurisdiction and Hears Public Interest Litigation Challenging Alienation of Communidade Land to Builders. Alleged Fraud and Violation of Goa Agricultural Tenancy Act, 1964 and Goa Land Use (Regulation) Act, 1991 in Consent Decree and Sale Deeds.

The High Court of Bombay at Goa heard two connected writ petitions – a public interest petition (WP 294/2008) by Pilerne Citizens Forum and a suo mo...