Search Results for "Share"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "Share"

5600 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5600 result(s)

High Court

Special Court Accepts 'B' Summary Report in Securities Fraud Case — Mistake of Fact Found. Complaint under Sections 406, 409, 420 IPC against accused for alleged misappropriation of mutual fund investments closed as investigation revealed no criminal intent.

5 Jun 2006

The case was initiated on a complaint by Sudhir Manjrekar, the constituted attorney of Canbank Mutual Fund, against Shrenik K. Jhaveri alleging offenc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. The Court held that the appellant-defendant failed to prove exclusive title by adverse possession and that the suit was not barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

6 Jan 2016

The dispute pertains to a suit for partition and separate possession of agricultural lands filed by the original plaintiff (respondent no.1) against t...

High Court

High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Insufficient Evidence Linking Assessee to Alleged Undisclosed Income. Reopening Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Held Invalid as Seized Documents from 2017 and Broker's Statement Did Not Name Petitioner and Failed to Corroborate Alleged On-Money Transaction in 2021 Property Sale.

19 Jan 2026

The dispute involved a writ petition challenging a reassessment notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 20...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Against Trial Court's Order on Court Fee in Partition Suit — Section 35(1) of Karnataka Court-Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1958. The court held that the trial court must first determine the market value of the suit properties before directing the plaintiff to pay proper court fee.

24 Aug 2021

The petitioner, Anjanappa, filed a suit for partition (O.S.No.808/2008) before the Additional Civil Judge and JMFC, Devanahalli, seeking 1/3rd share i...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 CPC fails as no substantial question of law arises from concurrent findings of courts below regarding declaration of title and injunction.

3 Mar 2020

The appellant, Maruti A/F Laxman Patil, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Petition Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 for Appointment of Arbitrator in Joint Development Agreement Dispute. Memorandum of Agreement dated 14.06.2012 Contains Valid Arbitration Clause.

2 Jan 2019

The petitioners, three individuals, filed a petition under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of a sole ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition Against Order Holding Partition Suit Maintainable Despite Earlier Compromise Decree. Court Rules That a Compromise Decree Does Not Bar a Fresh Suit for Partition When the Decree Was Not Acted Upon and the Parties Continued in Joint Possession.

21 Jun 2019

The petitioner, defendant No.1 in O.S.No.114/2017, filed a revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challenging ...

High Court

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging SAFEMA Forfeiture — Petitioner's Share Not Illegally Acquired Property. Court holds that forfeiture under Section 7 of SAFEMA cannot extend to property acquired by the petitioner from independent sources, not traceable to the detenu's illegal activities.

2 Apr 2026

The case involves a writ petition filed by Zahida Begum (since deceased, represented by her legal heirs) challenging the forfeiture of her share in a ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Revokes Leave for Representative Suit in Tata Group Shareholder Dispute. Court holds that shareholders of different listed companies lack the same interest required under Order 1 Rule 8 CPC.

10 Jul 2017

The Plaintiffs, claiming to be shareholders of various listed companies of the Tata Group, filed a representative suit under Order 1 Rule 8 of the Cod...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Finds Substantial Question of Law on Adverse Possession and Limitation. Court holds that the first appellate court failed to properly consider the plea of adverse possession and limitation, and remands the matter for fresh consideration.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a second appeal arising from a partition suit. The appellants, original plaintiffs, filed a suit for partition and separate possessi...

40 41 42 43 44

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)