Search Results for "Reserved Seat"

720 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 720 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence and Delay in Trial. Appellant, who suffered burn injuries himself, was not shown to have committed the murder or caste-based insults; co-accused already granted bail.

The appellant, Mangesh Chandrakant Ransing, filed an appeal under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Caste-Based Intent. Appellant Alleged Victim of False Implication in Murder and Attempt to Murder Case Under Sections 302, 307, 203 IPC and Sections 3(1)(r)(s) & 3(2)(va) of SC & ST Act.

The appellant, Mangesh Chandrakant Ransing, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Orders of District Deputy Registrar in Election Nomination Dispute. Requirement of Declaration Under Rule 45 of Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing Rules, 1967 Held Mandatory.

The petitioner, Gyanba s/o Trimbakrao Shirale, challenged the orders of the District Deputy Registrar, Parbhani, which allowed appeals filed by respon...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheating Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute — Contractual Breach Without Deception Does Not Attract Section 420 IPC.

The petitioner, Sussanne Khan, a sole proprietor of a design firm, was engaged by the respondent no. 3, Mudhit Gupta, under a written contract to prov...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in MCOCA Kidnapping Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand for Ransom. Conviction under Section 364A IPC and MCOCA set aside as prosecution failed to prove that the victim was kidnapped for ransom.

The appellants, original accused nos. 1 to 4, were convicted by the Special Judge under MCOC Case No. 15 of 2005 for offences under Section 364A, 365,...