Search Results for "Punjab Civil Services Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Punjab Civil Services Rules"

1199 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1199 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Vodafone's Appeal on CENVAT Credit for Telecom Towers and Shelters. CENVAT Credit on Towers and Prefabricated Buildings Denied as They Are Immovable Property and Not Capital Goods Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.

10 Sep 2015

The Appellant, Vodafone India Ltd., filed appeals under section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 read with section 83 of the Finance Act, 1994, cha...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Retired Employee’s Challenge to Recovery of Excess Pay from Pension Benefits. Court Holds That Voluntary Undertakings Bind Employee and Recovery Is Permissible Under Rule 134A of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, Distinguishing Rafiq Masih Based on Jagdev Singh.

6 May 2025

The petitioner, a retired Registrar of the District Court, Osmanabad, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Tax on Medical Reimbursement Above Rs.15,000 as Perquisite Under Section 17(2) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Medical reimbursement exceeding Rs.15,000 per annum treated as taxable perquisite is not arbitrary or discriminatory and does not violate Articles 14 or 21 of the Constitution.

13 Nov 2006

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by bank employees' associations and an individual officer challenging the constitutional validity of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against State's Allotment of Surplus Land Under ULC Act — Petitioner Failed to Establish Any Right After Repeal. Land vested in the State under Sections 8, 9, and 10 of the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976, prior to its repeal, remains with the State and cannot revert merely because the Act was subsequently repealed.

27 Oct 2016

The matter before the Bombay High Court arose from a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by Chhaganlal Khimji and Co. L...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows BSNL Appeal in TTA Recruitment Case: Reserved Category Candidates Selected on Merit Can Be Adjusted Against Reserved Vacancies. The Court held that the High Court erred in directing shuffling of candidates as it would unsettle the selection process under the BSNL Recruitment Rules.

28 Apr 2022

The case pertains to a recruitment process for Telecom Technical Assistants (TTAs) by Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL) in the Rajasthan Telecom Cir...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Whether Removal of Driver Under Maharashtra Zilla Parishad Rules Based Solely on Conviction for Incident Outside Service Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Proportionality. The Court found that disciplinary authority must consider circumstances and that conduct leading to conviction must constitute misconduct under service rules, not merely a conviction, to warrant removal.

28 Aug 2012

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution was filed by the legal heirs of deceased employee Champalal Paliwal against the order of remov...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petitions in Rafale Procurement Case, Corrects Factual Error in Judgment. The Court held that the review petitions did not disclose any error apparent on the face of the record and that the scope of judicial review under Article 32 in procurement matters is limited to examining the decision-making process, pricing, and offsets.

14 Nov 2019

The Supreme Court of India delivered a judgment on a review petition and miscellaneous applications arising from its earlier judgment dated 14.12.2018...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act Against Rejection of Section 9 Petition — Interim Relief Granted to Foreign Investor in Shareholder Dispute. Court holds that the arbitral tribunal's jurisdiction to decide on interim measures does not preclude the court from granting interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, especially when the tribunal is not yet constituted.

29 Jan 2021

The Appellant, Aniket SA Investments LLC, a foreign investor and shareholder in Respondent No. 1 (Janapriya Engineers Syndicate Private Limited), file...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Withdrawal of Voluntary Retirement Application by Widowed Medical Officer - Rule of Prospective Sanction and Withdrawal Before Acceptance. The court held that an employee can withdraw a voluntary retirement application before it is accepted and communicated, and that leave cannot be sanctioned prospectively.

25 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Dr. Mahananda Mahadev Jaybhaye-Munde, a Medical Officer in the Maharashtra Public Health Department, joined service on 22 June 2002. A...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Appoints Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in a Commercial Contract Dispute. Appointment Made after Respondent Failed to Prove Valid Appointment of Arbitrator Despite Alleged Forfeiture of Right.

19 Nov 2010

The dispute arose from an agreement dated 8 January 2003 between Voltas Limited (applicant) and Rolta India Limited (respondent) for the supply, erect...

40 41 42 43 44

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)