Search Results for "Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966"

678 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 678 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for Road Construction Due to Delay and Laches. Petitioners' claim of non-compliance with Section 126(4) MRTP Act fails as award was passed under Land Acquisition Act and possession taken long ago.

24 Mar 2023

The petitioners, owners of land in Latur, challenged the acquisition of their land by the Municipal Council for construction of a development plan roa...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Land Reservation Lapse Case Under MRTP Act — Notice Held Valid and Acquisition Steps Inadequate. The court held that the second notice under Section 127 was not premature and the municipality failed to take adequate acquisition steps within 24 months, resulting in lapsing of reservation.

1 Jan 2019

The appellant, a partnership firm and joint owner of land in Survey No.7, Mouja Durgavada, Morshi, had its land reserved for shopping centre and garde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landowners’ Writ Petitions Challenging Refusal to Grant Development Permission Based on Non-Issuance of Gazette Notification Under Section 127(2) of MRTP Act, 1966. Court Holds That Lapsing of Reservation Declared by Court Under Section 127(1) Takes Immediate Effect and Development Rights Are Not Dependent on Subsequent Notification.

3 Jul 2013

The case involved five writ petitions filed by different landowners whose lands were originally reserved under the Development Plan of Amravati for va...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Property Tax Dispute — Municipal Corporation Cannot Levy Tax on Land Outside Its Limits. Library Building on Gat No. 72, Satara Village, Held Outside Aurangabad Municipal Corporation Area, Tax Demand Quashed.

26 Feb 2014

The appellant, Gramaudyogik Shikshan Mandal, a registered charitable trust imparting technical education, filed a suit against the Municipal Corporati...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Constructions in Shirdi — Held That No Prior Notice Under Section 53(1) of MRTP Act Is Required for Demolition of Unauthorized Structures Under Section 52.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners filed two writ petitions challenging the demolition of their structures by the Nagar Panchayat, Shirdi, under the Maharashtra Regional...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Penalty for Excavation of Ordinary Earth Without Authorization Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code — Petitioner Had Valid Development Permission and No Mining Intent. Excavation of ordinary earth as part of construction project does not attract royalty or penalty under Section 48(7) of MLRC if done under valid development permission.

8 Mar 2024

The petitioner, AIGP Developers (Pune) Private Limited, challenged an order dated 29 June 2023 passed by the Tehsildar, Haveli (Pune), under Section 4...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging MCGM's Condition of 100% Tenant Consent for Redevelopment of Dilapidated Buildings. Clause 1.15 of C-1 Guidelines Requiring Permanent Alternate Accommodation Agreements with All Tenants as Precondition for Commencement Certificate is Valid and Enforceable.

20 Mar 2023

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the condition imposed by the Municipal Corpo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Refusal of Building Permission Due to Playground Reservation Under MRTP Act. Notice Under Section 127 Held Not Premature as 10-Year Period for Acquisition Had Expired.

13 Oct 2023

The petitioner, Irfan Allabaksh Shaikh, owned land bearing CTS No. 6167 in Siddheshwar Peth, Solapur, which was reserved as a playground (site No. 319...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Order for Unauthorized Extensions in Commercial Premises. Petitioners Failed to Show Any Sanctioned Plan or Permission for Structures on Compulsory Open Space Under Section 55 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

2 May 2011

The petitioners, occupants and owners of shops in Dattani Shopping Centre, Mumbai, challenged an order dated 14 January 2011 passed by the Assistant M...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Heritage Committee's Approval for Demolition of Heritage Building. Court holds that the Heritage Committee's decision is final and binding, and the petitioners failed to demonstrate any illegality or arbitrariness in the approval process.

5 May 2017

The petitioners, Prakash V. Patel and Dilnar Jehanbux Chichgar, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) before the Bombay High Court challenging the ...

40 41 42 43 44

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)