Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Constructions in Shirdi — Held That No Prior Notice Under Section 53(1) of MRTP Act Is Required for Demolition of Unauthorized Structures Under Section 52.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 10
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners filed two writ petitions challenging the demolition of their structures by the Nagar Panchayat, Shirdi, under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. The petitioners claimed that they had constructed the structures after obtaining permission from the Gram Panchayat, but the Nagar Panchayat subsequently issued notices under Section 53(1) of the MRTP Act and demolished the structures without giving them an opportunity of hearing. The respondents contended that the constructions were unauthorized and that Section 52 of the MRTP Act does not require any prior notice before demolition. The court examined the provisions of Sections 52 and 53 of the MRTP Act and held that Section 52 deals with unauthorized constructions and does not require any notice before demolition, whereas Section 53 applies to authorized constructions that deviate from sanctioned plans and requires a notice under Section 53(1). Since the petitioners' structures were unauthorized, no notice under Section 53(1) was required. The court also rejected the argument that principles of natural justice require a hearing, stating that when a statute provides a specific procedure, natural justice cannot be invoked to add a requirement not contemplated. The petitions were dismissed.

Headnote

A) Town Planning - Unauthorized Construction - Demolition - Sections 52, 53 Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - The court considered whether prior notice under Section 53(1) is mandatory before demolition of unauthorized structures under Section 52 - Held that Section 52 does not require any prior notice and the provisions of Section 53(1) apply only to demolition of authorized but deviated constructions, not to wholly unauthorized constructions - Petitioners' structures were unauthorized and liable to be demolished without notice (Paras 5-8).

B) Town Planning - Demolition - Natural Justice - Section 52 Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 - The court examined the argument that principles of natural justice require a hearing before demolition - Held that when a statute provides a specific procedure, the principles of natural justice cannot be invoked to add a requirement not contemplated by the statute - Since Section 52 does not provide for notice, no such notice is required (Paras 5-8).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether prior notice under Section 53(1) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 is required before demolition of unauthorized constructions under Section 52 of the said Act.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Both writ petitions are dismissed. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Unauthorized construction
  • demolition without notice
  • Section 52 MRTP Act
  • Section 53 MRTP Act
  • Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act
  • 1966
  • natural justice
  • prior notice requirement
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (BOM) (12) 13

Writ Petition No.6366 of 2009 and Writ Petition No.9133 of 2013

0000-00-00

Mr. S.B. Talekar with Mr. K.M. Nagarkar for petitioners; Mr. S.V. Kurundkar, Govt. Pleader for respondents 1,3 and 5; Mr. V.D. Hon, Advocate for respondent No.4

Bhausaheb s/o. Murlidhar Gondkar and Raosaheb s/o. Murlidhar Gondkar (in WP 6366/2009); Sau. Sanjivani w/o. Dashrath Mahambre, Rajni w/o. Vishwas Joglekar, and Soniya w/o. Devidas Patil (in WP 9133/2013)

State of Maharashtra, Director of Town Planning, Assistant Director of Town Planning, Nagar Panchayat Shirdi, Sub Divisional Officer Shrirampur

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging demolition of structures by Nagar Panchayat under MRTP Act.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought to quash the demolition and restrain further demolition without notice.

Filing Reason

Petitioners alleged that their structures were demolished without prior notice under Section 53(1) of MRTP Act.

Issues

Whether prior notice under Section 53(1) of MRTP Act is required before demolition of unauthorized constructions under Section 52. Whether principles of natural justice require a hearing before demolition under Section 52.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that they had obtained permission from Gram Panchayat and that demolition without notice under Section 53(1) violated natural justice. Respondents argued that constructions were unauthorized and Section 52 does not require any notice.

Ratio Decidendi

Section 52 of the MRTP Act does not require any prior notice before demolition of unauthorized constructions. Section 53(1) applies only to authorized constructions that deviate from sanctioned plans. Principles of natural justice cannot override the specific statutory procedure.

Judgment Excerpts

Section 52 of the said Act does not require any prior notice before demolition of unauthorized constructions. The provisions of Section 53(1) apply only to demolition of authorized but deviated constructions, not to wholly unauthorized constructions.

Acts & Sections

  • Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966: 52, 53
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Demolition of Unauthorized Constructions in Shirdi — Held That No Prior Notice Under Section 53(1) of MRTP Act Is Required for Demolition of Unauthorized Structures Under Section 52.
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Transfers Investigation to CBI in Police Firing and Caste Abuse Case. Court Finds Police Misconduct and Counter Case Registration Necessitate Impartial Probe Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.