Search Results for "Illegal gratification"

479 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 479 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Invalid Sanction. Sanction Granted by Sub-Divisional Officer Instead of Collector Held Incompetent, Despite Satisfactory Evidence of Demand and Acceptance.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Anti-Corruption Bureau, Satara, appealed against the acquittal of Ramdas Bhagwan Vairat, a Talathi (village reve...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Section 353 IPC Case for Lack of Evidence of Assault or Criminal Force. Conviction under Section 353 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove that appellant assaulted or used criminal force to deter public servants from discharging their duty.

The appellant, Mahendra Kumar Sonker, a Patwari, was convicted under Section 353 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for allegedly assaulting or usin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice — Service of notice under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 must be proved by actual delivery or proper postal dispatch, not mere endorsement of 'not claimed'.

The petitioner, Sanjay Bapuso Dalvi, aged 57 years, an agriculturist, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Disciplinary Inquiry Despite Non-Filing of Charge Sheet in Criminal Case. Non-filing of charge sheet by police does not preclude disciplinary proceedings against a government servant on same allegations.

The petitioner, a Commercial Tax Officer, challenged the order of the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal dismissing his application to set aside a repo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Articles of Charges Against KSRTC Employees for Lack of Power to Lay Traps Under Security Standing Orders. The court held that the Security Standing Orders do not authorize the laying of traps, rendering the disciplinary proceedings without jurisdiction.

The petitioners, employees of the Karnataka Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC) and Bangalore Metropolitan Transport Corporation (BMTC), challenged the...