Search Results for "Finance Act amendments"

600 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 600 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petitions in KVAT Act Case — Joint Commissioner Had Jurisdiction to Invoke Suo Moto Revision Under Section 63-A. Purchases from Composition Dealers Not Deductible from Contract Receipts for Taxable Turnover.

The case involves revision petitions filed by M/S JMC Projects (India) Ltd. against the State of Karnataka under Section 65(1) of the Karnataka Value ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Reserves Judgment on Petition to Quash Charge Sheet in NDPS Act Rave Party Case. Non-compliance with Urine Sample Testing Procedure at Government Hospital and Absence of FSL Report Raised as Grounds.

The petitioners, ten individuals arrayed as accused in a rave party case, filed a writ petition before the Karnataka High Court under Article 226 of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of IGST on Exports Under Protest, Rejects Unjust Enrichment Claim. Payment under protest does not attract doctrine of unjust enrichment under Section 54 of CGST Act, 2017.

The petitioner, Venus Jewel, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, challenging the refusa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Admission of Winding-Up Petition Against Telecom Company Due to Substratum Erosion and Deadlock. Cancellation of 2G Licences and Irreconcilable Differences Between Equal Shareholders Justify Winding-Up Under Section 433(f) of the Companies Act, 1956.

The appeal arose from an order of the company judge admitting a petition for winding up of Etisalat D.B. Telecom Limited (the company) under Section 4...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal of Contract Labourer Seeking Absorption from 1992 and Half-Service Counting. Seniority among contract labourers does not arise for absorption; delay in absorption due to verification does not entitle retrospective regularization.

The appellant, T. Sivaraman, filed a Writ Appeal against the order dated 19.09.2022 in W.P.No.25469 of 2016, wherein his claim for absorption on par w...