Search Results for "Affidavit verification"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Affidavit verification"

1691 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1691 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Appeal Seeking Police Custody Remand in MCOCA Case — Special Judge's Order Not Perverse. Court holds that police custody cannot be granted after accused is already in judicial custody without new grounds, and that the State failed to show sufficient evidence under Section 3(3) of MCOC Act, 1999.

10 Jan 2017

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the order dated 6th December 2016 passed by the learned Special Judge under the Maharashtra Control o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Appeals Concerning Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant, Addressing Safety and Regulatory Measures Under Atomic Energy Act, 1962. The Court Deliberates on Balancing National Energy Policy with Public Apprehensions Stemming from Past Nuclear Incidents.

1 Jan 1970

The case centers on appeals related to the establishment of a nuclear power plant at Kudankulam in Tamil Nadu. The judgment begins by acknowledging th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Public Employment Selection Case Due to Trivial Date of Birth Error. Inadvertent error in online application form, where date of birth discrepancy did not confer any advantage or affect eligibility, was held trivial under the principle de minimis non curat lex, and candidature should not be cancelled after successful clearance of all selection stages.

2 Jan 2024

The dispute arose from the appellant's application for a Police Constable post under the reserved category. He hailed from a small village in Bihar an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank Employee's Petition Challenging Dismissal for Availing Housing Loan Without Construction. Labour Court's findings of fair enquiry and non-perverse findings are upheld; no interference under Article 226.

26 Mar 2024

The petitioner, an employee of SVC Co-operative Bank Ltd., was dismissed from service after a domestic enquiry found him guilty of availing a housing ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Cancellation of Admission in Part-Time Diploma Course — Admission Cancellation Order Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice. The court held that the order cancelling admission without giving an opportunity of hearing is unsustainable and directed the respondents to consider the petitioners' case afresh after hearing them.

17 Apr 2024

The petitioners, five individuals, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court challenging an or...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging SVLDRS-3 Demand for Interest Component Under Sabka Vishwas Scheme. Interest paid under protest prior to show cause notice is part of tax dues under Section 124(2) of Finance Act, 2019.

13 Jan 2023

The Petitioner, National Centre for the Performing Arts, a public trust registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, and engaged in providin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPD Act for Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Public Order Disturbance. Detenu's Preventive Detention as Dangerous Person Set Aside as In-Camera Statements Were Not Properly Considered and Bail/Notice Under Section 41-A CrPC Were Ignored.

21 Apr 2023

The petitioner, Atahar Khan Amir Khan, a detenu, challenged the detention order dated 29.08.2022 passed by the Collector and District Magistrate, Akol...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Violation of Section 3(2) Proviso — Initial Detention Cannot Exceed Six Months. The court held that the proviso to Section 3(2) of the MPDA Act mandates an initial detention period of only six months, and a 12-month initial order is illegal.

3 Apr 2023

The petitioner, Himanshu Roy, challenged a detention order passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nagpur, on 30 July 2022, confirmed by the State of Ma...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices and Orders Under Section 153 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Valid Sanction and Non-Application of Mind. Reassessment proceedings initiated without proper approval under Section 151(2) and based on borrowed satisfaction are invalid.

4 Sep 2023

The petitioner, Ashok Commercial Enterprises, filed nine writ petitions challenging reassessment notices dated 19th July 2021 and 14th July 2021 issue...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Specification of Period — Blanket Order Invalid Under Section 3(2) Proviso. The court held that the proviso to Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 mandates specification of detention period in the order, and a blanket order without such specification is invalid.

23 Feb 2021

The petitioner, Sadashiv s/o Shriram Jadhav, challenged the legality and correctness of a detention order dated 18.9.2020 passed by the Collector and ...

40 41 42 43 44

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)