Search Results for "1894"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "1894"

1754 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1754 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Compensation Redetermination Under Section 28(A) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 — Limitation Period Computed from Date of Knowledge of Award. Petitioners' application for redetermination of compensation held within limitation as time runs from date of knowledge of the award, not from the date of award.

25 Jan 2012

The petitioners, whose lands were acquired for the Mukane Dam Project, sought redetermination of compensation under Section 28(A) of the Land Acquisit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Daughter's Claim in Land Acquisition Reference Despite Mutation Entry in Favor of Brother's Family. Court Holds Mutation Entry Not Conclusive of Title and Daughter Entitled to Share as Co-owner Under Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

22 Mar 2012

The petitioner, Sakhubai @ Shakuntala V. Chopde, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Reference Court under Sections 30 and 31 of the La...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Unsigned Award Declared Invalid. An award under Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 must be signed by the officer; death of officer before signing renders award a nullity and land does not vest under Section 16.

15 Mar 2019

The case involves a second appeal by the original plaintiffs (appellants) against the judgment of the District Court, Thane, which reversed the trial ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Reference Dispute — Apportionment of Compensation Set Aside for Lack of Notice to Interested Party. Failure to Issue Notice Under Section 20 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 to the Original Respondent No. 2 Renders the Reference Proceedings Void Ab Initio.

27 Jun 2019

The present appeal arises from a judgment and order passed by the learned Ad hoc District Judge-1, Dhule, in Civil M.A. No. 16/2015, which was a refer...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Section 28A Application for Enhanced Compensation — Land Acquisition Officer's Order Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Natural Justice and Limitation Provisions. The court held that the application under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, was within limitation and the rejection without hearing violated natural justice.

13 Sep 2019

The petitioners, legal heirs of Balwant Kannav, challenged the order dated 31.03.1999 passed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer, Yavatmal, reject...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals Challenging Land Acquisition Proceedings — Civil Suit Barred Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Court held that a civil suit challenging acquisition proceedings after notice under Section 9 and delivery of possession is not maintainable, following the precedent in State of Bihar v. Dhirendra Kumar.

20 Jan 2005

The appellants, claiming to be owners or tenants of certain immovable property, filed suits challenging acquisition proceedings initiated by the State...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Punishment for Overstaying Furlough/Parole — Remission Forfeiture Set Aside as Disproportionate. Principle of Proportionality Applied to Prison Discipline: Punishment Must Be Commensurate with Gravity of Misconduct, Not Automatic Based on Days of Overstay.

15 Feb 2013

The petitioner, Shafi Vazruddin Qureshi, was convicted for murder under Section 302 read with 149 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment. While underg...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Furlough to Life Convict in Furlough Rejection Case — Nature of Offence Not a Valid Ground for Denial Under Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959. Furlough is a right, not a privilege, and cannot be denied solely because the prisoner was convicted under Section 366 IPC.

4 Sep 2013

The petitioner, Subhash Hiralal Bhosale, was convicted under Sections 376(2), 366, 342, 506(II) read with 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code and sentence...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Road Construction Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Petitioners' Challenge to Notification Under Section 4 and Declaration Under Section 6 Fails as Court Finds No Violation of Statutory Requirements or Principles of Natural Justice.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, residents of Pernem, Goa, filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition of their land for the construction of a road by the State...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Corrigendum to Final Development Plan. Corrigendum Restoring Botanical Garden Reservation Upheld as Permissible Rectification of Error Without Fresh Notification Under MRTP Act.

17 Apr 2006

The petitioner, Housilal Balchand Shah, owned land in survey no. 34 at Anand Valli, Nasik. In the draft development plan under the Maharashtra Regiona...

40 41 42 43 44

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)