Search Results for "sufficient reasons"

11388 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 11388 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Non-Bailable Warrants Against Accused in MCOC Act Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Involvement in Organized Crime Syndicate. Court Finds No Material to Implicate Petitioners in Offences Under Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 and Arms Act.

The two criminal writ petitions challenged the non-bailable warrants and orders of the Special Court under the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging DJR's Order in Co-operative Society Dispute. DJR Exceeded Jurisdiction by Re-appreciating Evidence in Disqualification of Defaulting Directors Under Section 152 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960.

The petitioner, Pravin Indarchand Jain, a member of Mahavir Nagari Sahakari Patpedhi Maryadit Chopda (Mahavir Society), filed complaints before the Di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition, Quashes District Collector's Order Setting Aside No Confidence Motion Against Upsarpanch. No Confidence Motion Valid Despite Discrepancy in Reasons, as Expression of Want of Confidence Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1959.

The dispute arose from a no-confidence motion moved against the Upsarpanch of Group Grampanchayat, Adkhal, Taluka Dapoli, District Ratnagiri. The Gram...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Liberal Interpretation of Delay Condonation Under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. High Court Erred in Dismissing Delay Condonation Application for 45 Days Without Considering Beneficial Nature of Legislation.

The appeal arose from a motor accident claim where the deceased, aged 26, died in a collision with a negligently parked truck on 15.04.2011. The appel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Magistrate's Order Refusing Police Investigation Under Section 156(3) CrPC in Hit-and-Run Case. Court Holds That Magistrate Must Apply Mind to Complaint and Pass Speaking Order, Not Merely Direct Inquiry Under Section 202 CrPC.

The applicant, Smt. Rekha Shambharkar, filed a criminal application before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 22/10/2012 passed by the J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Parents' Maintenance Claim Against Son Under Section 125 CrPC — Son Earning Rs. 3 Lakhs Per Month Directed to Pay Rs. 40,000 Per Month to Parents. Maintenance Award Upheld as Parents Shown to Be Unable to Maintain Themselves Despite Owning Some Land.

The respondents, Govindrao Upasrao Naik and Mankarnabai, parents of the applicant Vasant Govindrao Naik, filed an application under Section 125 of the...