Search Results for "separate suit maintainability"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "separate suit maintainability"

774 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 774 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Civil Revision Application in Arbitration Reference Case — Contract Contained Arbitration Clause, Court Erred in Rejecting Section 8 Application. Dispute arose from a logistical services contract dated 01/10/2010; the trial court's rejection of the defendant's application under Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was set aside as the arbitration clause was valid and enforceable.

31 Aug 2015

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by Sesa Sterlite Limited (formerly Sterlite Industries (India) Ltd.) against M/s. BLR Logistiks (...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in IBC Limitation Dispute — Application Under Section 7 Held Barred by Limitation. Acknowledgment of Debt in Balance Sheets Does Not Extend Limitation for Initiating CIRP Under IBC.

9 Aug 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Babulal Vardharji Gurjar, a director of Veer Gurjar Aluminium Industries Pvt. Ltd., against the order of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment in Specific Performance Suit to Add Alternative Claim for Damages and Refund. Amendment seeking alternative relief of damages and refund in lieu of specific performance does not introduce a new cause of action and is not barred by limitation under Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963.

6 Feb 2013

The appeal arose from a decision of a Learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 6 March 2012, allowing an amendment to the plaint in a suit ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds NCLAT Decision on Limitation in Insolvency Petition Initiated by Financial Creditor. Application Under Section 7 of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Held Within Limitation After Excluding Time Spent in SARFAESI Proceedings Under Section 14(2) of Limitation Act, 1963.

22 Mar 2021

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dismissing an appeal against an order of the National Company ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision by Statutory Body in Suit for Accounts — Suit for Accounts Not Maintainable Against Statutory Body Without Contractual Right. Plaint Rejected Under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC as Barred by Law.

29 Jun 2011

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the Maharashtra Water Supply and Sewerage Board (defendant) challenging an order of the Civil ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal as Withdrawn in Company Law Dispute Over Shareholding and Project Implementation. Parties Agreed to Settle Dispute and Withdraw Appeal, Resulting in Dismissal Without Adjudication on Merits.

13 Jan 2005

The present appeal was filed under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956 against an order of the Company Law Board dated 8.12.2000. The dispute perta...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Order; Upholds Rent Controller's Jurisdiction Despite Absence of Written Lease Under Goa Rent Control Act, 1968. The Court Holds Section 34 of the Act to be Directory, Not Mandatory, and Refuses to Interfere with Concurrent Findings of Fact That the Tenant's Denial of Title Was Not Bonafide.

1 Feb 2018

The petitioner, Abdul Sattar Kulli, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution before the High Court of Bombay at Goa, challenging th...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Suit for Declaration and Compensation for Land Utilisation by Forest Department. Trial Court Erroneously Applied Sanction Requirement Under Section 114-A(1) of Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 Instead of Notice Requirement Under Section 114-A(2) for Civil Suit.

7 Apr 2026

The appellants, who are legal heirs of original landholders, filed a suit before the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Bidar, seeking a declaration of th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Central Excise Case — Cutting and Grooving of Aluminum Composite Panels Does Not Amount to Manufacture. Process of cutting, grooving, and routing ACPs for façade cladding does not bring into existence a new product with distinct name, character, and use under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.

27 May 2026

The appellant, is a construction contractor that imports Aluminum Composite Panels (ACPs) and undertakes cutting, grooving, and routing of these panel...

High Court

Bombay High Court Sets Aside Family Court’s Rejection of Amendment to Written Statement; Allows Counterclaim in Matrimonial Dispute. Court Holds Counterclaim Not Barred by Delay if Filed Within Three-Year Limitation Under Article 113, Limitation Act, 1963.

8 Dec 2011

The petitioner wife filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the Family Court's order rejecting her applicatio...

39 40 41 42 43

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)