Search Results for "receiver sale"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Corporate Debtor's Appeal Against Admission of Insolvenc...
Supreme Court Dismisses Corporate Debtor's Appeal Against NCLT Order Admitting I...

Search Results for "receiver sale"

458 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 458 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit Involving 'Ankur' Mark — Plaintiff Establishes Prima Facie Case of Passing Off and Likelihood of Confusion. The court held that the defendants' use of the identical mark 'Ankur' for identical goods constitutes infringement and passing off under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

10 Nov 2025

The plaintiff, Innovations Garment Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the defendants, Bhavesh Ramjibhai Gada a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Decree-Holder's Petition Under Article 227 in Execution Proceedings — Order XXI Rule 41 CPC Mandates Judgment-Debtor to File Affidavit of Assets. The Court held that the Commercial Court erred in dismissing the application for asset disclosure without considering the mandatory nature of Order XXI Rule 41 CPC.

30 Jul 2025

The petitioner, Ms. Sumita Abhishek Sundaram, is the decree-holder in a commercial execution proceeding (Com. Ex. 541 of 2024) pending before the LXXX...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Asset Disclosure Application Against Judgment Debtors Despite Suit Disposal — Order XXI Rule 41 CPC Applicable in Execution Proceedings. Court Rejects Functus Officio Argument and Holds That Existence of Security Does Not Bar Disclosure Order.

14 Jan 2019

The Plaintiff filed a suit for recovery of Rs.1.26 Crores against the Defendants, which was decreed by consent terms dated 14th June 2016, wherein the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Seeking Permanent Stay of Winding Up of Svadeshi Mills Company Limited. Section 466 of Companies Act, 1956 does not permit stay of winding up after assets have been sold and substantial progress made in liquidation.

23 Aug 2013

The case concerns an appeal against the dismissal of a company application under Section 466 of the Companies Act, 1956, seeking a permanent stay of t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Issued Against Petitioners in Maharashtra Fire Prevention Act Case — Lack of Sanction Under Section 36 Renders Complaint Invalid. Court held that prior sanction of the Commissioner is mandatory for prosecution under Sections 3(1), 3(3), 3(4) r/w 36 of the Maharashtra Fire Prevention and Life Safety Measures Act, 2006, and its absence vitiates the criminal proceedings.

6 May 2013

The petitioners, seven residents of Jolly Maker I Cooperative Housing Society in Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Restraining BCCI from Terminating IPL Franchise Agreement with Deccan Chronicle Holdings Limited. Court Holds Termination Notice Invalid for Not Providing 30-Day Cure Period Under Clause 11.1 of Franchise Agreement.

1 Oct 2012

The petitioner, Deccan Chronicle Holdings Limited (DCHL), filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking to r...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to Arbitral Award in Banking Dispute — Upholds Liability of Company but Sets Aside Award Against Directors for Lack of Evidence. The court held that directors cannot be held personally liable for company debt without personal guarantee or specific evidence under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

17 Mar 2011

The present petition was filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the arbitral award dated 31st March, 2006 p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Confirms Reduction of Equity Share Capital of Wartsila India Limited — Court Approves Special Resolution for Reduction of Share Capital to Provide Exit to Minority Shareholders, Rejecting Oppression Allegations. The Court held that the reduction was bona fide and not oppressive, and confirmed the reduction under Section 100 of the Companies Act, 1956.

15 Nov 2010

The judgment concerns a Company Petition filed by Wartsila India Limited (WIL) seeking confirmation of a special resolution passed on 10th November 20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Notified Person Under Special Courts Act, Holding Attached Property Cannot Be Sold in Debt Recovery Execution Without Custodian's Consent. Attachment Under Section 3(3) of Special Courts Act, 1992 Prevails Over Certificate Under Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.

17 Jan 2006

The petitioner, Ketan Parekh, was declared a notified party on 6.10.2001 under the Special Courts (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Secur...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for De-reservation of Land Reserved for High School and Playground in Development Plan. Petitioners failed to show that reservation had lapsed under Section 127 of MRTP Act, 1966 as no notice under Section 127 was issued.

21 Sep 2005

The petitioners, owners of land bearing Survey No.99 (now 99-A) and site Nos.142 and 145 at Malegaon, District Nasik, filed a writ petition seeking de...

39 40 41 42 43

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)