Search Results for "public access"

1798 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1798 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Section 18A of SC/ST Act Against Challenge of Unconstitutionality — Amendment Restores Pre-Dr. Subhash Kashinath Position After Review

The petitioners challenged the constitutional validity of Section 18A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 198...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION NO.259 OF 2009

The Public Interest Litigation was filed by Bhimshakti Vichar Manch, a registered trust, and another petitioner, challenging the Foodgrain Based Disti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against 13 Petitioners in Cheating Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute. Court holds that criminal proceedings cannot be used as a tool for recovery of money in a purely contractual dispute.

The petitioners, 13 individuals, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against 13 Petitioners in Cheating Case Due to Civil Nature of Dispute. Breach of Contract Does Not Constitute Criminal Offence Under Sections 406, 420 IPC When No Fraudulent Intention at Inception.

The petitioners, 13 individuals, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Disposes PIL on Footpath Encroachments with Directions for Removal and Monitoring. Court holds that encroachments on public footpaths violate pedestrian rights and must be cleared by municipal authorities, with compliance monitored by District Legal Services Authority.

The petitioner, D.S. Ramachandra Reddy, an advocate, filed a public interest litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Challenging APMC Market Fee Exemption for Farmers. Exemption notification under Section 63 of Karnataka APMC Act, 1966 held valid and not violative of Article 14.

The petitioners, who are traders and commission agents in the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC) yard at Tiptur, filed a Public Interest Lit...