Search Results for "psychotropic substances"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "psychotropic substances"

526 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 526 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50. Failure to Inform Appellant of Right to Search Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Renders Recovery of Ganja Inadmissible.

23 Apr 2024

The appellant, Sunny Arjun Sonavane, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Thane, in Sessions Case No.388/2013 for possession of 7.5 kg of g...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Conviction Under NDPS Act — No Interference with Concurrent Findings of Fact. The court held that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 cannot be used to reappreciate evidence or overturn concurrent findings of fact unless perversity is shown.

24 Apr 2024

The petitioner was convicted under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) by the trial court, and the conviction was uphe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Default Bail to Accused Under MCOCA for Non-Compliance with Section 167(2) CrPC — Extension of Investigation Period Without Notice to Accused Invalid. The court held that the right to be heard before extension of investigation period is a fundamental facet of natural justice, and its violation entitles the accused to default bail.

3 Mar 2023

The petitioners, accused in a crime registered under Sections 307, 109 read with Section 34 IPC and Sections 3 and 25 of the Arms Act, along with prov...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Preventive Detention Orders Under PITNDPS Act — Detention Orders Quashed for Non-Compliance with Procedural Safeguards. Failure to Communicate Grounds in Understandable Language and Delay in Considering Representations Under Section 3(1) of PITNDPS Act, 1988 Renders Detention Invalid.

18 Apr 2023

The judgment concerns three criminal writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging preventive detention orders passe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Violation of Section 3(2) Proviso — Initial Detention Cannot Exceed Six Months. The court held that the proviso to Section 3(2) of the MPDA Act mandates an initial detention period of only six months, and a 12-month initial order is illegal.

3 Apr 2023

The petitioner, Himanshu Roy, challenged a detention order passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nagpur, on 30 July 2022, confirmed by the State of Ma...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 — Failure to Inform Right to Search Before Magistrate Leads to Acquittal. The court held that non-compliance with Section 50 of the NDPS Act, 1985, vitiates the trial and entitles the accused to acquittal.

28 Jun 2023

The case involves four criminal appeals filed by individuals convicted under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) for p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction Under Maharashtra Prohibition Act for Possession of Illicit Liquor — Sentence Reduced to Period Already Undergone. Court finds no illegality in conviction under Section 65(e) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 but reduces sentence to 6 months considering the accused's age and period of incarceration.

23 Jun 2023

The applicant, Gajanan S/o. Vikram Gose, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Tiroda, for an offence under Section 65(e) of the Mahar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Illegal Teakwood Transport Under Indian Forest Act, 1927 — Revision Dismissed Due to Lack of Evidence of Ownership or Authorization. The court held that the burden of proof under Section 42 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 shifts to the accused once possession of timber is established, and the applicant failed to prove lawful possession.

5 Oct 2023

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Shrikrishna Rambhau Orivkar, who was convicted by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Akola, on ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Illegal Teakwood Transport Under Indian Forest Act, 1927 — Revision Dismissed for Lack of Evidence of Ownership or Innocent Possession. The court held that the burden under Section 69 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 shifts to the accused once possession of forest produce is established, and the applicant failed to rebut the presumption that the teakwood was government property.

5 Oct 2023

The case pertains to a criminal revision application filed by Shrikrishna Rambhau Orivkar, who was convicted by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Akola, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Wildlife Offence Case — Confessional Statements and Seizures Held Admissible Under Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972. The court dismissed the revision application challenging the conviction under Sections 9, 27, 29, 31 read with Section 51(1) of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972 for hunting Chitals in Nagzira Forest.

5 Oct 2023

The judgment arises from a criminal revision application filed by five accused (original accused Nos. 8, 9, 10, 11, and 13) challenging their convicti...

39 40 41 42 43

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)