Bombay High Court Grants Default Bail to Accused Under MCOCA for Non-Compliance with Section 167(2) CrPC — Extension of Investigation Period Without Notice to Accused Invalid. The court held that the right to be heard before extension of investigation period is a fundamental facet of natural justice, and its violation entitles the accused to default bail.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 85
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, accused in a crime registered under Sections 307, 109 read with Section 34 IPC and Sections 3 and 25 of the Arms Act, along with provisions of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act (MCOCA), were arrested on 10.12.2021. They filed bail applications under Section 167(2) CrPC read with Section 12 of MCOCA, claiming entitlement to default bail as the charge-sheet was not filed within the prescribed period of 180 days. The Special Judge, Ahmednagar, rejected their bail applications and granted extension of time for filing charge-sheet vide order dated 09.05.2022. The petitioners challenged both orders. The High Court held that the extension of investigation period under MCOCA cannot be granted without affording an opportunity of hearing to the accused, as it directly affects their right to liberty. Since the extension was granted ex parte, it was invalid. Consequently, the accused were entitled to default bail. The court allowed the petition, set aside the impugned orders, and directed the release of the petitioners on bail subject to conditions.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Default Bail - Section 167(2) CrPC read with Section 12 MCOCA - Right to be heard before extension of investigation period - The court held that the extension of time for filing charge-sheet under MCOCA cannot be granted without affording an opportunity of hearing to the accused, as it affects their liberty. Since the extension was granted ex parte, the accused are entitled to default bail. (Paras 10-15)

B) Criminal Procedure - Computation of Period for Default Bail - Section 167(2) CrPC - The period of 90 days for filing charge-sheet applies to offences punishable with death, imprisonment for life, or imprisonment for 10 years or more. For other offences, it is 60 days. Under MCOCA, the period is 180 days. The court computed the period from the date of first remand and found that the charge-sheet was filed beyond the prescribed period. (Paras 8-9)

C) Criminal Procedure - Extension of Investigation Period - Section 12 MCOCA - The court held that the power to extend the investigation period under MCOCA is not automatic and must be exercised judiciously, with notice to the accused. The extension order dated 09.05.2022 was set aside as it was passed without hearing the accused. (Paras 12-14)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the accused are entitled to default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC read with Section 12 of MCOCA when the charge-sheet was filed beyond the prescribed period and the extension of time for investigation was granted without notice to the accused.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The impugned order dated 09.05.2022 rejecting bail and granting extension of time is set aside. The petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing a PR bond of Rs. 25,000/- each with one or two sureties. The petitioners shall not tamper with evidence or influence witnesses and shall attend the trial regularly.

Law Points

  • Default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC
  • extension of investigation period under MCOCA
  • right to be heard before extension
  • computation of 90/180 days for default bail
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (03) 5

Criminal Writ Petition No. 1076 of 2022

2023-03-03

Kishore C. Sant

Mr. Nitin Sejpal, Advocate h/f Smt. S. G. Sonawane, Advocate for the Petitioners; Mr. P. N. Kutti, APP for Respondent; Mr. R. R. Karpe, Advocate for Assist to APP

Kiran Madhav Hazare and Akshay @ Aakash Rangnath Lokhande

The State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition seeking default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC read with Section 12 MCOCA, challenging rejection of bail and extension of investigation period.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought bail under Section 167(2) CrPC read with Section 12 MCOCA on the ground that charge-sheet was not filed within the prescribed period.

Filing Reason

The petitioners were arrested on 10.12.2021 in connection with FIR No. I-394 of 2021 for offences under IPC and Arms Act, and MCOCA was invoked. They claimed entitlement to default bail as the charge-sheet was not filed within 180 days.

Previous Decisions

The Special Judge, Ahmednagar, rejected the bail applications and granted extension of time for filing charge-sheet vide order dated 09.05.2022.

Issues

Whether the extension of investigation period under Section 12 MCOCA can be granted without notice to the accused? Whether the accused are entitled to default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC when the charge-sheet is filed beyond the prescribed period?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the extension of time for investigation was granted ex parte without affording them an opportunity of hearing, violating principles of natural justice, and thus they are entitled to default bail. Respondent State argued that the extension was validly granted and the charge-sheet was filed within the extended period, so default bail is not available.

Ratio Decidendi

The extension of investigation period under Section 12 MCOCA cannot be granted without affording an opportunity of hearing to the accused, as it directly affects their right to liberty. Since the extension was granted ex parte, it is invalid, and the accused are entitled to default bail under Section 167(2) CrPC.

Judgment Excerpts

The extension of time for filing charge-sheet under MCOCA cannot be granted without affording an opportunity of hearing to the accused, as it affects their liberty. Since the extension was granted ex parte, the accused are entitled to default bail.

Procedural History

FIR lodged on 10.12.2021; petitioners arrested; bail applications filed under Section 167(2) CrPC read with Section 12 MCOCA; Special Judge rejected bail and granted extension of time on 09.05.2022; petitioners filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 1076 of 2022; petition withdrawn by petitioner Nos. 2 to 4; judgment pronounced on 03.03.2023 allowing petition for petitioner Nos. 1 and 5.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC): Section 167(2)
  • Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 (MCOCA): Section 12
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC): Sections 307, 109, 34
  • Arms Act, 1959: Sections 3, 25
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Scrutiny Committee Invalidation of Scheduled Tribe Caste Claim but Protects Retiral Benefits Under Article 142. Pre-Constitutional Records Showing 'Koli' Held to Have High Probative Value to Reject 'Tokre Koli' Claim, While Supr...
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Wilful Disobedience Due to Limitation — Delay of 7.5 Years in Filing Contempt Petition Under Section 11 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Is Barred by Limitation.