WRIT PETITION NO. 10533 OF 2023
2 May 2025...
Search Results for "notice under section 19(2)"
681 result(s) found
Found 681 result(s)
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses State's Revision Petitions in Agricultural Income Tax Cases — Limitation Period for Revision Under Section 55(1) of KAIT Act, 1957 Is 4 Years and Cannot Be Extended. The court held that Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 is not applicable to revision petitions under Section 55(1) of the Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act, 1957, and the revisional authority has no power to condone delay beyond the prescribed period of 4 years.
25 Mar 2014The case involves a batch of civil revision petitions filed by the State of Karnataka under Section 55(1) of the Karnataka Agricultural Income Tax Act...
- 43
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Rape on False Promise of Marriage and Abetment of Miscarriage in Andaman & Nicobar Islands. Consent vitiated by misconception of fact under Section 375 IPC; conviction under Sections 376 and 312 IPC restored.
1 Jan 2026The case involves an appeal by Mukesh Kumar Yadav against the judgment of the High Court at Calcutta (Circuit Bench at Port Blair) dated 23.04.2026, w...
- 71
High Court
High Court Hears Appeal Against Conviction in Murder Conspiracy Case. Trial Court Convicted Accused for Murder of Sitting MLA Under Sections 302, 307, 120B IPC, but Accused Challenges Validity of Trial Based on Illegal Charge Sheet and Manipulated Evidence.
15 Mar 2024The accused No.6 (appellant) appealed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by the I Additional District and Sessions Judge,...
- 17
High Court
High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against MLA and Another for Fire Safety Violations Due to Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC. Proceedings under Section 285 IPC and Section 25 of Karnataka Fire Force Act, 1964 quashed as petitioners were public servants entitled to protection under Section 197 CrPC.
29 Aug 2024The petitioners, Sri B S Suresh (a sitting MLA from Hebbala Constituency) and Sri Pradoosh Dhanraj, were accused in C.C.No.56902/2019 for offences und...
- 197
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Winding-Up Petition Against Kingfisher Airlines Ltd. for Lack of Service of Statutory Notice. Petition under Sections 433(e) and (f) of the Companies Act, 1956 fails as petitioner Aerotron Limited did not prove service of demand notice under Section 434.
18 Nov 2016The petitioner, Aerotron Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales, filed a winding-up petition under Sections 433(e) and (f...
- 69
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Validation Act in Import Fee Dispute. Parliament Competent to Enact Retrospective Validation to Cure Defect in Subordinate Legislation, Even if It Affects Pending Litigation.
5 May 2006The petitioners, M/s R. Piyarelall Import & Export Ltd. and its director, challenged the constitutional validity of the Destructive Insects and Pests ...
- 92
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Winding Up Petition Against Airline Company for Inability to Pay Debts. Creditor's Statutory Demand for USD 3 Million Remained Unpaid, Leading to Order for Winding Up Under Sections 433(e) and (f) of the Companies Act, 1956.
18 Nov 2016The petitioner, Aerotron Limited, a company incorporated under the laws of England and Wales, filed a company petition under Sections 433(e) and (f) r...
- 78
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Challenging Reinstatement Order. Employer-Employee Relationship Established Despite Contractor System, Termination Held Unfair Labour Practice Under MRTU & PULP Act.
17 Feb 2006The petitioner, Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation, challenged the order of the Industrial Court dated 17/9/1999, which reversed the Labou...
- 123
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Validity of Revenue Department’s Order Rejecting Correction of Clerical Error in Land Consolidation Scheme Under Section 31A of the Maharashtra Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act, 1947. The Court Scrutinizes Whether the Mandatory Procedure for Scheme Implementation Under Section 22 Was Complied With and Whether Limitation Under Section 32 Bars Correction of Clerical Mistakes.
21 Nov 2025The matter pertains to a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the ord...
- 129
