Search Results for "key management person"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "key management person"

452 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 452 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Modifies Conviction from Section 376(2)(f) to Section 376(1) IPC in Rape of Minor Case — Sentence Reduced to Period Already Served. Victim's Age Above 12 Years Makes Section 376(2)(f) Inapplicable, Minimum Sentence Provision Not Attracted.

10 Dec 2015

The appellant, Shahanawaj Shamsuddin Bhadgaonkar, was convicted by the Adhoc District Judge-2 and Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan, in Sessions Case ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Blacklisting Order Against Contractor in ONGC Contract Dispute — Violation of Natural Justice as Show Cause Notice Did Not Specify Proposed Penalty. Show Cause Notice Must Clearly Indicate Intended Action of Blacklisting to Afford Meaningful Opportunity of Hearing Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

2 Mar 2016

The petitioner, Anchor Offshore Services Ltd (Anchor), a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, challenged a blacklisting order dated 5th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeals of Accused in Murder Case — Conviction Under Section 302 IPC Set Aside Due to Lack of Common Object to Murder. The court held that the appellants, who were not named in the FIR and whose role was limited, could not be convicted for murder under Section 149 IPC as the common object to murder was not proved.

15 Oct 2025

The case arises from an incident on 27 April 1999 where Ankush Gholap was murdered and two others were injured during a wedding-related dispute. The a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Insolvency Case Regarding Security Interest and Pledge of Shares — NCLAT Order Set Aside. The Court held that the Corporate Debtor's creation of security by way of pledge of shares of its subsidiary in favour of the appellants constituted a valid security interest under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and the moratorium under Section 14 does not bar the enforcement of such security by a secured creditor.

24 Aug 2020

The present appeal arises from an order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dated 24.08.2020, which dismissed the appeal filed by t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears State of Maharashtra's Appeals Against High Court's Decision Striking Down Section 33A of Bombay Police Act, 1951 as Violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(g). The core issue is whether the prohibition of dance performances in eating houses, permit rooms, or beer bars is a reasonable restriction on trade and is within the State's legislative competence.

1 Aug 2026

The Supreme Court heard a batch of civil appeals filed by the State of Maharashtra and others assailing the judgment and order dated 12th April 2006 o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Grants Leave to Appeal Against High Court Order Upholding CLB's Condonation of Delay in Share Transmission Registration. Core Issue Revolves Around Interpretation of Section 58(3) of Companies Act, 2013 and the CLB's Inherent Powers to Apply Limitation Act Provisions.

1 Jan 1970

The dispute centered on the condonation of a 249-day delay in filing an appeal under Section 58(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 before the Company Law B...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs States to Ensure Free Legal Aid to Prison Inmates Under Article 21 and 39-A of the Constitution — Access to Justice for Indigent Prisoners is a Fundamental Right. The Court held that free legal assistance is a fundamental right even if not requested, and Magistrates must inform accused of this right.

4 Oct 2024

The present writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution was filed by Suhas Chakma seeking directions to the Union of India, States, and Union T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Admiralty Suit — Vessel Arrest Set Aside for Lack of Same Beneficial Ownership. The court held that the arrest of a vessel under admiralty jurisdiction requires proof that the vessel is in the same beneficial ownership as the charterer liable for the claim, and mere common control or management is insufficient.

9 Dec 2019

The case involves a commercial appeal filed by Rainbow Ace Shipping S.A. Panama, the registered owner of the vessel M.V. Rainbow Ace, against an order...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Against SARFAESI Proceedings Due to Non-Compliance with Section 18(1) Second Proviso — Debt Recovery Tribunal Failed to Consider Borrower's Application Before Issuing Recovery Certificate. The court held that the DRT must decide an application for waiver or reduction of the pre-deposit under Section 18(1) second proviso of the SARFAESI Act before entertaining the appeal or issuing a recovery certificate.

8 Oct 2013

The judgment involves two writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the actions of secured creditors under the S...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Deduction Case Under Section 80-IA(4). Tribunal's finding that assessee qualified as developer of infrastructure facilities for Srisailam and Koyna projects was upheld, as assessee undertook development work and transferred facility to government, meeting statutory criteria under Income-Tax Act, 1961.

11 Mar 2026

The dispute arose from appeals filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income-Tax Act, 1961, challenging orders of the Income Tax Appellate Tri...

39 40 41 42 43

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)