Search Results for "interest refund"

2387 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2387 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Quashing Seizure Order Under Section 67(2) of CGST Act Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Requirements. Seizure of cash from residential premises of an employee without proper authorization and recording of reasons held invalid, cash ordered to be returned.

The petitioners, B. Kusuma Poonacha and J K Manjunath, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Revision Petition in Consumer Execution Proceedings. Holds that Execution is Continuation of Consumer Dispute Under Section 21(b) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The present Civil Appeal arose out of execution proceedings initiated by the Respondent-Complainant, K. A. Nagamani, against the Appellant, Karnataka ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Railway Licence Plot Dispute — Courts Below Failed to Consider Admission Under Order VIII CPC. Refund of Rs.50,050 with 18% Interest Upheld as Railway's Admission of Receipt Not Denied.

The original plaintiff, Bhika s/o Antu Kale, a retired Railway servant, filed Regular Civil Suit No.996 of 1987 against the Railways for possession an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Refund Order in Consumer Case Against Builder for Delayed Possession. Builder's Failure to Deliver Villa by Agreed Date Constitutes Deficiency in Service Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The case involves an appeal by Marvel Omega Builders Pvt. Ltd. and another against the judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Forfeiture of Earnest Money in Contract for Sale of Aero-Scrap. Clause Explicitly Stipulating Deposit as Earnest Money and Forfeiture on Default Valid Under Sections 64 and 74 of Contract Act, 1872.

The dispute arose from a contract for sale of aero-scrap between the appellants, Shree Hanuman Cotton Mills, and the respondent, Tata Air-Craft Ltd. T...