CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.935 OF 2014
2 Nov 2018The High Court of Judicature at Bombay considered three criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad-Aliba...
Search Results for "father convicted"
3080 result(s) found
Found 3080 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Evaluates Appeal by Convicted Accused Against Conviction Under Sections 302 and 324 IPC. The Trial Court Conviction Was Based on Eyewitness Testimony and the Fact That the Weapon Remained Embedded in the Deceased's Skull.
13 Jul 2018The accused Anil Bansi Alhat was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar in Sessions Case No. 254 of 2010 for offences under Section 302 (murder) ...
- 67
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eye-Witnesses and Tainted Recovery. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
11 Mar 2022The case pertains to a criminal appeal filed by Shrikant Ankushrao Bramhane and Sachin Shankarrao Dehane against their conviction for the murder of Ka...
- 51
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal in POCSO Case, Reduces Sentence for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault. Conviction under Section 4 of POCSO Act, 2012 upheld but sentence reduced from 10 years to 7 years, while acquittal under Section 376(2)(i) IPC and other offences confirmed.
24 Sep 2019The case involves three appeals arising from a judgment of the Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar in Sessions Case No. 367 of 2013. The appellant-accused, Kis...
- 155
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Inconsistent Medical Evidence. Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 302, 307, 452, 504, 506, 143, 147, 148, 149 of IPC.
1 Aug 2017The appellant, Abdul Rauf Abdul Razzak, filed an appeal against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 17-11-2008 passed by the learned Ad-hoc Addi...
- 90
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Kalaburagi Bench Considers State Appeal Against Acquittal in Rape and House Trespass Case. The Court Examines Whether Trial Court Erred in Holding Victim Major and Sexual Act Consensual, Despite School Certificate Suggesting Minority.
27 Oct 2022The State of Karnataka filed an appeal under Section 378(1) and (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the acquittal of the responde...
- 23
High Court
Bombay High Court Reviews Conviction of Accused in Hotel Murder and Rape Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Trial Court Had Convicted Under Sections 302, 376, 201 IPC After Finding Chain of Circumstances Including Absconding and DNA Match.
16 Dec 2016The appeal arose from the conviction of Vishal @ Shivaji Mahadeo Kamble by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati, in Sessions Case No.66 of 20...
- 16
High Court
Bombay High Court Larger Bench Examines Nature of Parole and Validity of Proviso to Rule 19(2) of Prisons (Bombay Furlough and Parole) Rules, 1959. Challenge to Proviso Restricting Parole to Once a Year Based on Articles 14 and 21 Referred to Larger Bench After Earlier Division Bench Upheld Validity in Gajanan Babulal Bathulwar v. State of Maharashtra.
13 Sep 2019The petitioner, a life convict undergoing sentence for offences under the Indian Penal Code, filed a writ petition challenging the rejection of his pa...
- 19
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Improper Appreciation of Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
20 Jun 2013The appellant, Sitaram Hiraman Jopale, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his wife Bharati. The prosecution case was that the appel...
- 124
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness testimony found unreliable and prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
13 Nov 2006The appellant, Jony @ Abdul Rahim Abdul Khalik Shaikh, was convicted by the IInd Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Kalyan in Sessions Case No.22 of 20...
- 76
