Search Results for "employee"

7044 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7044 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Institute's Appeal in Gratuity Dispute — Retrospective Amendment Covers Teachers Under Payment of Gratuity Act. Teacher's Claim for Gratuity Upheld as Amended Definition of 'Employee' Includes Teachers with Retrospective Effect from 1997.

The Supreme Court of India dealt with an appeal by Birla Institute of Technology (BIT) against the State of Jharkhand and others, concerning the entit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Denial of Compassionate Appointment Due to Third Child Born After 2001. Clause-E of Government Resolution dated 28-3-2001 held constitutional and not violative of Article 14 as it promotes family planning.

The petitioner, Musaddique Ahmad Khan, is the son of a deceased Assistant Teacher, Muqaddar Khan Mumtaz Khan, who died in harness on 2 September 2015....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Gratuity Award to Principal. Teacher/Principal Held to Be 'Employee' Under Section 2(e) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, Following Supreme Court Precedent.

The petitioner, Vidarbha Youth Welfare Institution (Society), challenged the judgment and order dated 29-5-2010 passed by the Controlling Authority un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension Order in Forgery Case Due to Lack of Enquiry and Retrospective Effect. Suspension of teacher set aside as management failed to conduct proper enquiry and suspension was made retrospective without authority.

The petitioner, Subhag S. Kavi, was employed as a teacher at Respondent No.4 School, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel Vividhlakshi Vidyalaya & Junior College....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Employer's Petition to Deduct Gratuity for Misconduct Causing Pecuniary Loss Under Section 4(6)(a) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972. Disciplinary Order Not Challenged by Employee Attained Finality, Controlling Authority Cannot Set It Aside.

The petitioner, Western Coalfields Ltd., challenged the order of the Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, which set aside th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Teacher but Denies Back Wages in Oral Termination Case. School Management's Appeal Dismissed as Termination Without Inquiry Violates Section 9 of Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977.

The case involves two writ petitions arising from an order of the School Tribunal, Nagpur, dated 19-11-2014. The School Tribunal allowed an appeal und...