Search Results for "constitutionality"

557 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 557 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Company Fraud Case. Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Barred Under Section 10GB of Companies Act, 1956 for Fraud Allegations.

The appellants, M/s. Candolim Developers Pvt. Ltd. and its director Sunil Thukral, filed a suit before the Civil Judge Senior Division, Panaji, seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Citizenship and Police Verification Requirements for Security Guards Under Private Security Agencies Act. Provisions Held to Be Reasonable Restrictions in Interest of Public Order and Security.

The petitioner, The Security Association of India, an association of security agencies, filed a writ petition challenging the constitutional validity ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 479(2) of MMC Act, 1888 — License Fee Fixation by Commissioner Upheld. The court held that the power to fix fees is not unguided and does not violate Articles 14 or 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Rushabh Outdoors (a partnership firm) and Vandana Borse (proprietress of M/s. Synnovation), challenged the constitutional validity of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Passport Impounding Orders — Violation of Natural Justice. Impounding under Section 10(3)(e) of Passports Act, 1967 set aside as no show cause notice or hearing was given.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by individuals whose passports were impounded by the Passport Authority under Section 10(3)(e) of the P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in SC/ST Act Case — Rent Dispute Not Caste-Based. Allegations of Abusive Language Without Caste Reference Do Not Attract Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) of SC/ST (POA) Amendment Act, 2015.

The petitioners, owners of a flat in Bangalore, entered into a rental agreement with the second respondent-complainant on 21.06.2018. A dispute arose ...